A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer.

Purpose: Few studies have compared follow-up-care models for adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCCs), though choice of model could impact medical test adherence, and health-related quality of life (QOL). This study compared two follow-up-care models, cancer-center-based versus community-based, f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cancer Survivorship Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 547 - 558
Autores principales: Reynolds, K., Spavor, M., Brandelli, Y., Kwok, C., Li, Y., Disciglio, M., Carlson, L. E., Schulte, F., Anderson, R., Grundy, P., Giese-Davis, J.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137870883&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 137870883
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19322259
        46CU
      jtl: Journal of Cancer Survivorship
      issn: 19322259
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2019
      vid: 13
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137870883
        137870883
        NLM31250352
        137870883
        10.1007/s11764-019-00774-w
        NLM31250352
        137870883
      ppf: 547
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: A comparison of two models of follow-up care for adult survivors of childhood cancer.
      aug:
        au:
          Reynolds, K.
          Spavor, M.
          Brandelli, Y.
          Kwok, C.
          Li, Y.
          Disciglio, M.
          Carlson, L. E.
          Schulte, F.
          Anderson, R.
          Grundy, P.
          Giese-Davis, J.
        affil: Long Term Survivor's Clinic, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW, T3B 6A8, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          After Care
          Management
          Neoplasms Therapy
          Male
          Adolescence
          Middle Age
          Child, Preschool
          Child
          Neoplasms Pathology
          Canada
          After Care Standards
          Patient Compliance
          Female
          Prospective Studies
          Neoplasms Epidemiology
          Adult
          Human
          Quality of Life
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Scales
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: Few studies have compared follow-up-care models for adult survivors of childhood cancer (ASCCs), though choice of model could impact medical test adherence, and health-related quality of life (QOL). This study compared two follow-up-care models, cancer-center-based versus community-based, for ASCCs in Alberta, Canada, to determine which model would demonstrate greater ASCC adherence to guideline-recommended medical screening tests for late effects, QOL, physical symptoms, and adherence to yearly follow-up.Methods: ASCC discharged to a community model (over 15 years) and those with comparable birth years (1973-1993) currently followed in a cancer center model were recruited via direct contact or multimedia campaign. Chart review identified chemotherapeutic and radiation exposures, and required medical late effect screening tests. ASCCs also completed questionnaires assessing QOL, physical symptoms, and follow-up behavior.Results: One hundred fifty-six survivors participated (community (n = 86); cancer center (n = 70)). Primary analysis indicated that cancer center ASCCs guideline-recommended total test adherence percentage (Mdn = 85.4%) was significantly higher than the community model (Mdn = 29.2%, U = 3996.50, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in QOL for cancer center ASCCs (M = 83.85, SD = 20.55 versus M = 77.50, SD = 23.94; t (154) = 1.77, p = 0.078) compared to community-based ASCCs. Cancer center-based ASCCs endorsed from 0.4-7.1% fewer physical symptom clusters, and higher adherence to follow-up behavior in comparisons using effect sizes without p values.Conclusion: This study highlights the cancer center model's superiority for adherence to exposure-based medical late effect screening guidelines, cancer-specific follow-up behaviors, and the reporting of fewer physical complaints in ASCCs.Implications For Cancer Survivors: ASCCs followed in a cancer center model likely benefit from earlier late-effects detection and opportunities for early intervention.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N