The effect of grasp compatibility in go/no-go and two-choice tasks.
The grasp compatibility effect has been put forward as evidence for the automatic involvement of the motor system during mental object representation. In three experiments, participants responded to object pictures or names by grasping cylinders using a precision or power grasp. In a two-choice task...
| Publicado en: | Memory & Cognition Vol. 47; no. 6; pp. 1076 - 1088 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Aug2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=137871383&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 137871383 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 0090502X MEG jtl: Memory & Cognition issn: 0090502X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Aug2019 vid: 47 iid: 6 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 137871383 10.3758/s13421-019-00917-5 ppf: 1076 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 835KB tig: atl: The effect of grasp compatibility in go/no-go and two-choice tasks. aug: au: Pecher, Diane Roest, Sander Zeelenberg, René affil: Psychology Department, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Postbus 1738, 3000 DR, Rotterdam, The Netherlands su: Task performance Cognitive testing Grip strength sug: subj: Task performance Cognitive testing Grip strength keyword: Conceptual memory Grasp compatibility Grounded cognition Motor affordances Stimulus–response compatibility Conceptual memory Grasp compatibility Grounded cognition Motor affordances Stimulus–response compatibility ab: The grasp compatibility effect has been put forward as evidence for the automatic involvement of the motor system during mental object representation. In three experiments, participants responded to object pictures or names by grasping cylinders using a precision or power grasp. In a two-choice task in which both grasps were used, we obtained grasp compatibility effects, but in a go/no-go task, in which only one grasp was used, there was no effect. These results indicate that the effect depends on the availability of response choice, in the present case, different size grasps. This suggests that grasp compatibility effects are better explained by coding of the stimulus and response on the same dimension, size, rather than automatic activation of a motor action towards the object. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|