Bespoke STOMP training for learning disability teams—Does it work?

Accessible summary: ·There is significant concern about medication being given to people with intellectual disability (ID) inappropriately particularly to manage their behaviours which needs to stop.·This needs people who work and support people with ID with their distress to be aware of the nationa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol. 47; no. 3; pp. 181 - 188
Autores principales: Nancarrow, Thomas, Rencher, Joshua, Wilcock, Mike, Bonell, Simon, Wolke, Tony, Shankar, Rohit
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137943670&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 137943670
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13544187
        F04
      jtl: British Journal of Learning Disabilities
      issn: 13544187
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 47
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137943670
        137943670
        137943670
        10.1111/bld.12272
        137943670
      ppf: 181
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Bespoke STOMP training for learning disability teams—Does it work?
      aug:
        au:
          Nancarrow, Thomas
          Rencher, Joshua
          Wilcock, Mike
          Bonell, Simon
          Wolke, Tony
          Shankar, Rohit
        affil: University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Intellectual Disability Drug Therapy
          Psychotropic Drugs Therapeutic Use
          Inappropriate Prescribing
          Treatment Termination
          Multidisciplinary Care Team Education
          Persons with Disabilities Education
          Human
          Questionnaires
          England
          Health Knowledge
          Surveys
          Psychology
          Allied Health Personnel
          Health Priorities
      ab: Accessible summary: ·There is significant concern about medication being given to people with intellectual disability (ID) inappropriately particularly to manage their behaviours which needs to stop.·This needs people who work and support people with ID with their distress to be aware of the national concerns and guidance.·We checked whether NHS staff who work with people with ID , that is the ID service, are aware of the latest guidance and whether training them will help improve their knowledge.·We found that there were differences in knowledge in some groups such as nurses and psychologists compared to others and training can make a positive change. This is important as training can possibly deliver better care to people with ID . Background: Intellectual disability (ID) is associated with polypharmacy particularly off‐label psychotropics for "challenging behaviour." NHS England introduced the "stopping over medication of people with a learning disability (LD), autism or both" (STOMP) initiative. As ID services are a professionally diverse group, it is important to know whether teams have suitable knowledge to deliver STOMP. The impact of delivering bespoke STOMP training was evaluated. Methods: A 21‐item multiple‐choice questionnaire was distributed to three specialist ID teams in the south‐west of England. Current best practice and national guidance knowledge on psychotropic medication use in ID were assessed. One team received bespoke training covering the content of the questionnaire prior to completion. Results: Survey participation was 44% (21/48) by the trained team, 34% (15/44) and 70% (7/10) in the untrained teams. The trained team participants scored over 80% on 19/21 questions compared to 15/21 and 16/21 in the untrained teams. Subspeciality analysis of pooled data (n = 43) showed nursing scored more than 80% on 16/21 questions, psychology 15/21 and allied health professionals (AHPs) 19/21. Nursing and psychology both reported STOMP to be a priority. Majority responded "yes" to potentially being involved in STOMP. Conclusions: Better STOMP knowledge and understanding of best practice and guidelines are associated with training. Nursing and psychology are essential to STOMP delivery but scored lower than AHPs. We recommend semi‐structured STOMP training developed locally with national underpinnings for all specialist ID teams, particularly focussed on front‐line staff directly involved in the management of challenging behaviour.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N