Evaluation of the within- and between-day intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of positioning subjects into neutral and lordotic sitting postures.

Purpose: To assess the reliability of postural positioning in two different sitting postures (SP), within- and between-days, as well as intra-tester and inter-tester. Methods: Twenty six individuals were facilitated into lordotic (LSP) and neutral (NSP) SP on two different days by four physiotherapi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Journal of Physiotherapy Vol. 21; no. 3; pp. 142 - 153
Autores principales: Korakakis, Vasileios, O'Sullivan, Kieran, Sotiralis, Yiannis, Karanasios, Stefanos, Sideris, Vasilis, Sideris, Alexandros, Sakellariou, Konstantinos, Giakas, Giannis
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Sep2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=137944807&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 137944807
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        21679169
        FSGO
      jtl: European Journal of Physiotherapy
      issn: 21679169
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 21
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        137944807
        137944807
        137944807
        10.1080/21679169.2018.1503719
        137944807
      ppf: 142
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Evaluation of the within- and between-day intra-tester and inter-tester reliability of positioning subjects into neutral and lordotic sitting postures.
      aug:
        au:
          Korakakis, Vasileios
          O'Sullivan, Kieran
          Sotiralis, Yiannis
          Karanasios, Stefanos
          Sideris, Vasilis
          Sideris, Alexandros
          Sakellariou, Konstantinos
          Giakas, Giannis
        affil: Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece
      sug:
        subj:
          Reliability Evaluation
          Posture Education
          Sitting
          Patient Positioning
          Low Back Pain
          Neck Pain
          Human
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Consent (Research)
          Convenience Sample
          Physical Therapists
          Sample Size
          Female
          Male
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Body Height
          Body Mass Index
          Time Factors
          Variable
          Data Analysis Software
          T-Tests
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          Descriptive Statistics
          Confidence Intervals
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Purpose: To assess the reliability of postural positioning in two different sitting postures (SP), within- and between-days, as well as intra-tester and inter-tester. Methods: Twenty six individuals were facilitated into lordotic (LSP) and neutral (NSP) SP on two different days by four physiotherapists, while kinematic data were collected. Intra-tester and inter-tester reliability were assessed using measures of relative reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients, ICC) and absolute reliability (standard error of measurement-SEM; minimal detectable change; mean difference; limits of agreement). Results: Substantial or almost perfect relative reliability (ICC >0.67), with very good absolute reliability (SEM <2.7°) was found for both intra- and inter-tester (within- and between-day) reliability. However, likely due to methodological variation affecting head angles on Day 2, the reliability of head/neck angles were poor (ICC as low as −0.11, SEM ≤5.71°). Conclusion: This study suggests that postural positioning of asymptomatic individuals into NSP and LSP can be performed with very good reliability for most spinal angles. Therefore, clinicians can have some confidence that positioning in SPs can be done reliably. However, while the degree of error is typically small, the small range of movement occurring at many spinal angles suggests that determining what is a clinically meaningful change in posture is difficult.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N