From Planning to Prototypes: New Ways of Seeing Like a State.

All states have pursued what James C. Scott characterised as modernist projects of legibility and simplification: maps, censuses, national economic plans and related legislative programs. Many, including Scott, have pointed out blindspots embedded in these tools. As such criticism persists, however,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Modern Law Review Vol. 82; no. 5; pp. 833 - 864
Autor principal: Johns, Fleur
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=138089011&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 138089011
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00267961
        D8H
      jtl: Modern Law Review
      issn: 00267961
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 82
      iid: 5
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138089011
        10.1111/1468-2230.12442
      ppf: 833
      ppct: 31
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 265KB
      tig:
        atl: From Planning to Prototypes: New Ways of Seeing Like a State.
      aug:
        au: Johns, Fleur
      su:
        Prototypes
        Central economic planning
        Nongovernmental organizations
        International law
        Sustainable development
      sug:
        subj:
          Prototypes
          Central economic planning
          Nongovernmental organizations
          International law
          Sustainable development
      ab: All states have pursued what James C. Scott characterised as modernist projects of legibility and simplification: maps, censuses, national economic plans and related legislative programs. Many, including Scott, have pointed out blindspots embedded in these tools. As such criticism persists, however, the synoptic style of law and development has changed. Governments, NGOs and international agencies now aspire to draw upon immense repositories of digital data. Modes of analysis too have changed. No longer is legibility a precondition for action. Law‐ and policy‐making are being informed by business development methods that prefer prototypes over plans. States and international institutions continue to plan, but also seek insight from the release of minimally viable policy mock‐ups. Familiar critiques of law and development work, and arguments for its reform, have limited purchase on these practices, Scott's included. Effective critical intervention in this field today requires careful attention to be paid to these emergent patterns of practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Modern Law Review is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Modern Law Review
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N