Left atrial effective conducting size predicts atrial fibrillation vulnerability in persistent but not paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Background: The multiple wavelets and functional re‐entry hypotheses are mechanistic theories to explain atrial fibrillation (AF). If valid, a chamber's ability to support AF should depend upon the left atrial size, conduction velocity (CV), and refractoriness. Measurement of these parameters could...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 30; no. 9; pp. 1416 - 1428
Main Authors: Williams, Steven E., O'Neill, Louisa, Roney, Caroline H., Julia, Justo, Metzner, Andreas, Reißmann, Bruno, Mukherjee, Rahul K., Sim, Iain, Whitaker, John, Wright, Matthew, Niederer, Steven, Sohns, Christian, O'Neill, Mark
Format: diagnostic images equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2019
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=138441761&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 138441761
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 30
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138441761
        138441761
        138441761
        10.1111/jce.13990
        138441761
      ppf: 1416
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Left atrial effective conducting size predicts atrial fibrillation vulnerability in persistent but not paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
      aug:
        au:
          Williams, Steven E.
          O'Neill, Louisa
          Roney, Caroline H.
          Julia, Justo
          Metzner, Andreas
          Reißmann, Bruno
          Mukherjee, Rahul K.
          Sim, Iain
          Whitaker, John
          Wright, Matthew
          Niederer, Steven
          Sohns, Christian
          O'Neill, Mark
        affil: Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          Atrial Fibrillation Surgery
          Atrial Fibrillation Risk Factors
          Recurrence
          Heart Atrium, Left Anatomy and Histology
          Catheter Ablation
          Heart Conduction System
          Human
          Pulmonary Veins Surgery
          Computer Simulation
          Postoperative Period
      ab: Background: The multiple wavelets and functional re‐entry hypotheses are mechanistic theories to explain atrial fibrillation (AF). If valid, a chamber's ability to support AF should depend upon the left atrial size, conduction velocity (CV), and refractoriness. Measurement of these parameters could provide a new therapeutic target for AF. We investigated the relationship between left atrial effective conducting size (LAECS), a function of area, CV and refractoriness, and AF vulnerability in patients undergoing AF ablation. Methods and Results: Activation mapping was performed in patients with paroxysmal (n = 21) and persistent AF (n = 18) undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Parameters used for calculating LAECS were: (a) left atrial body area (A); (b) effective refractory period (ERP); and (c) total activation time (T). Global CV was estimated as √A/T. Effective atrial conducting size was calculated as LAECS=A/(CV×ERP). Post ablation, AF inducibility testing was performed. The critical LAECS required for multiple wavelet termination was determined from computational modeling. LAECS was greater in patients with persistent vs paroxysmal AF (4.4 ± 2.0 cm vs 3.2 ± 1.4 cm; P = .049). AF was inducible in 14/39 patients. LAECS was greater in AF‐inducible patients (4.4 ± 1.8 cm vs 3.3 ± 1.7 cm; P = .035, respectively). The difference in LAECS between inducible and noninducible patients was significant in patients with persistent (P = .0046) but not paroxysmal AF (P = .6359). Computational modeling confirmed that LAECS > 4 cm was required for continuation of AF. Conclusions: LAECS measured post ablation was associated with AF inducibility in patients with persistent, but not paroxysmal AF. These data support a role for this method in electrical substrate assessment in AF patients.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N