How to deliver personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy through the precise measurement of the acute hemodynamic response: Insights from the iSpot trial.

Introduction: New pacing technologies offer a greater choice of left ventricular pacing sites and greater personalization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The effects on cardiac function of novel pacing configurations are often compared using multi‐beat averages of acute hemodynamic measu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 30; no. 9; pp. 1610 - 1620
Main Authors: Shun‐Shin, Matthew J., Miyazawa, Alejandra A., Keene, Daniel, Sterliński, Maciej, Sokal, Adam, Heuverswyn, Frédéric, Rinaldi, Christopher A., Cornelussen, Richard, Stegemann, Berthold, Francis, Darrel P., Whinnett, Zachary
Format: pictorial research tables/charts tracings Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2019
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=138441768&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 138441768
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 30
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138441768
        138441768
        138441768
        10.1111/jce.14001
        138441768
      ppf: 1610
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: How to deliver personalized cardiac resynchronization therapy through the precise measurement of the acute hemodynamic response: Insights from the iSpot trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Shun‐Shin, Matthew J.
          Miyazawa, Alejandra A.
          Keene, Daniel
          Sterliński, Maciej
          Sokal, Adam
          Heuverswyn, Frédéric
          Rinaldi, Christopher A.
          Cornelussen, Richard
          Stegemann, Berthold
          Francis, Darrel P.
          Whinnett, Zachary
        affil: International Centre for Circulatory Health, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London United Kingdom
      sug:
        subj:
          Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Methods
          Hemodynamics Evaluation
          Individualized Medicine
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Pulmonary Veins Physiology
          Systolic Pressure
          Statistical Significance
      ab: Introduction: New pacing technologies offer a greater choice of left ventricular pacing sites and greater personalization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). The effects on cardiac function of novel pacing configurations are often compared using multi‐beat averages of acute hemodynamic measurements. In this analysis of the iSpot trial, we explore whether this is sufficient. Materials and Methods: The iSpot trial was an international, prospective, acute hemodynamic trial that assessed seven CRT configurations: standard CRT, MultiSpot (posterolateral vein), and MultiVein (anterior and posterior vein) pacing. Invasive and noninvasive blood pressure, and left ventricular (LV) dP/dtmax were recorded. Eight beats were recorded before and after an alternation from AAI to the tested pacing configuration and vice‐versa. Eight alternations were performed for each configuration at each of the five atrioventricular delays. Results: Twenty‐five patients underwent the full protocol of eight alternations. Only four (16%) patients had a statistically significant >3 mm Hg improvement over conventional CRT configuration (posterolateral vein, distal electrode). However, if only one alternation was analyzed (standard multi‐beat averaging protocol), 15 (60%) patients falsely appeared to have a superior nonconventional configuration. Responses to pacing were significantly correlated between the different hemodynamic measures: invasive systolic blood pressure (SBP) vs noninvasive SBP r = 0.82 (P < .001); invasive SBP vs LV dP/dt r = 0.57, r2 = 0.32 (P < .001). Conclusions: Current standard multibeat acquisition protocols are unfortunately unable to prevent false impressions of optimality arising in individual patients. Personalization processes need to include distinct repeated transitions to the tested pacing configuration in addition to averaging multiple beats. The need is not only during research stages but also during clinical implementation.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        tracings
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N