Use of a modified treatment-based classification system for subgrouping patients with low back pain: Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face assessments.

Objective: To examine the agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face assessments of patients with acute and subacute low back pain (LBP) using a modified treatment-based classification (TBC) system. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction with the telerehabilitation assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Theory & Practice Vol. 35; no. 11; pp. 1078 - 1087
Autores principales: Peterson, Seth, Kuntz, Chad, Roush, Jim
Formato: algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Nov2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=138454593&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 138454593
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09593985
        BCJ
      jtl: Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
      issn: 09593985
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov2019
      vid: 35
      iid: 11
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138454593
        138454593
        138454593
        10.1080/09593985.2018.1470210
        138454593
      ppf: 1078
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Use of a modified treatment-based classification system for subgrouping patients with low back pain: Agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face assessments.
      aug:
        au:
          Peterson, Seth
          Kuntz, Chad
          Roush, Jim
        affil: ProActive Physical Therapy, Tucson, Arizona, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Low Back Pain Classification
          Low Back Pain Rehabilitation
          Patient Satisfaction Evaluation
          Classification Methods
          Telerehabilitation
          Risk Assessment
          Human
          Female
          Male
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Consent (Research)
          Repeated Measures
          Correlational Studies
          Physical Examination
          Questionnaires
          Scales
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Power Analysis
          Data Analysis Software
          Sample Size
          Descriptive Statistics
          Correlation Coefficient
          Probability
          McNemar's Test
          Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test
          Effect Size
          Interrater Reliability
          Confidence Intervals
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objective: To examine the agreement between telerehabilitation and face-to-face assessments of patients with acute and subacute low back pain (LBP) using a modified treatment-based classification (TBC) system. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient satisfaction with the telerehabilitation assessment. Methods: Patients with LBP of less than 90 days' duration underwent both telerehabilitation and face-to-face assessments. After physical examination, patients were classified into one of three intervention groups (mobilization/manipulation, specific exercise, and stabilization). The assessment order and clinicians were randomized, and the clinicians were blinded to each other's classification decision. Results: Forty-seven patients participated (mean [SD] age, 48.6 [15.0] years; 70% female). The overall rate of percentage agreement was 68.1% (κ = 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–0.72). There was no difference in classification distributions between assessments (χ2 = 2.14, p = 0.54). The percentage agreement was 48.9%–59.6% for the modified TBC algorithm variables except for straight leg raise greater than 91°, which was markedly lower at 35.1%. This was the only variable that was significantly different between the telerehabilitation and face-to-face scenarios. The overall satisfaction with the telerehabilitation assessment was good. Conclusions: The results suggest that a telerehabilitation assessment using the modified TBC system may be able to direct treatment of patients with acute and subacute LBP. However, challenges still remain in applying this approach to clinical practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        algorithm
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Unknown
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N