RACE AND ANIMAL‐BREEDING: A HYBRIDIZED HISTORIOGRAPHY.
Because it associates animals with one of the most vital topics in human history, the historiography of the cross‐connections between race and animal‐breeding is at once controversial and inspiring. This article wishes to position this historiography in a more systematic framework than has been done...
| Publicado en: | History & Theory Vol. 58; no. 3; pp. 360 - 385 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=138541098&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 138541098 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00182656 HAT jtl: History & Theory issn: 00182656 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Sep2019 vid: 58 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 138541098 10.1111/hith.12122 ppf: 360 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 211KB tig: atl: RACE AND ANIMAL‐BREEDING: A HYBRIDIZED HISTORIOGRAPHY. aug: au: ZELINGER, AMIR affil: Portland, Oregon su: Historiography Livestock breeding Racism Human-animal relationships Animals Anthropomorphism sug: subj: Historiography Livestock breeding Racism Human-animal relationships Animals Anthropomorphism keyword: animal history animal‐breeding eugenics historiography human–animal relations race and racism ab: Because it associates animals with one of the most vital topics in human history, the historiography of the cross‐connections between race and animal‐breeding is at once controversial and inspiring. This article wishes to position this historiography in a more systematic framework than has been done thus far by examining both its merits and failings along with the more and less appropriate ways to write on the subject. The article identifies two main narratives in race–animal‐breeding historiography: the influence narrative and the projection narrative. The first reveals how perceptions of animal breeds and livestock‐breeding practices influenced the rise of racialist and eugenic worldviews. By contrast, the second shows how conceptualizations of human racial segregation contributed to the construction of ideas about the subdivision of domestic animal species into different breeds. The article argues that despite the projection narrative's inherent anthropomorphism, this perspective renders it possible to draft a nonanthropocentric history of the cross‐connections between race and animal‐breeding with a focus on human–animal relations rather than on human society. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of History & Theory is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: History & Theory holder: Wiley-Blackwell dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|