Using Confidence Intervals for Assessing Reliability of Real Tests.

Test authors report sample reliability values but rarely consider the sampling error and related confidence intervals. This study investigated the truth of this conjecture for 116 tests with 1,024 reliability estimates (105 pertaining to test batteries and 919 to tests measuring a single attribute)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Assessment Vol. 26; no. 7; pp. 1207 - 1217
Autores principales: Oosterwijk, Pieter R., van der Ark, L. Andries, Sijtsma, Klaas
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Oct2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=138545544&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 138545544
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10731911
        G70
      jtl: Assessment
      issn: 10731911
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2019
      vid: 26
      iid: 7
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138545544
        138545544
        138545544
        10.1177/1073191117737375
        138545544
      ppf: 1207
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Using Confidence Intervals for Assessing Reliability of Real Tests.
      aug:
        au:
          Oosterwijk, Pieter R.
          van der Ark, L. Andries
          Sijtsma, Klaas
        affil: Court of Audit, The Hague, Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Instrument Validation
          Reliability Evaluation
          Confidence Intervals Utilization
          Databases
          Quality Assessment
      ab: Test authors report sample reliability values but rarely consider the sampling error and related confidence intervals. This study investigated the truth of this conjecture for 116 tests with 1,024 reliability estimates (105 pertaining to test batteries and 919 to tests measuring a single attribute) obtained from an online database. Based on 90% confidence intervals, approximately 20% of the initial quality assessments had to be downgraded. For 95% confidence intervals, the percentage was approximately 23%. The results demonstrated that reported reliability values cannot be trusted without considering their estimation precision.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N