Cover Image
QR Code

Theory of Mind Performance in Broad Autism Phenotype Groups: Between-Group Differences and Predictor Variables.

Investigated between-group differences in cognitive/affective theory of mind (ToM) and predictors of cognitive ToM both within broad autism phenotype/non (BAP/Non-BAP) groups as well as across the sample. The BAP group (n = 45) performed worse than the Non-BAP group (n = 102) on the unexpected outco...

Full description

Published in:Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders Vol. 49; no. 10; pp. 4079 - 4097
Main Author: Camodeca, Amy
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Oct2019
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=138689635&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 138689635
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01623257
        AUT
      jtl: Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders
      issn: 01623257
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2019
      vid: 49
      iid: 10
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        138689635
        138689635
        144020775
        138689635
        10.1007/s10803-019-04126-6
        138689635
      ppf: 4079
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Theory of Mind Performance in Broad Autism Phenotype Groups: Between-Group Differences and Predictor Variables.
      aug:
        au: Camodeca, Amy
        affil: Psychology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, 100 University Drive, 15061, Monaca, PA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Theory of Mind Evaluation
          Cognition Evaluation
          Phenotype
          Autism Spectrum Disorder Psychosocial Factors
          Persons with Intellectual Disabilities Psychosocial Factors
          Task Performance and Analysis
          Human
          Psychological Tests
          Facial Expression Evaluation
          Regression Methods
          Recognition (Psychology) Evaluation
      ab: Investigated between-group differences in cognitive/affective theory of mind (ToM) and predictors of cognitive ToM both within broad autism phenotype/non (BAP/Non-BAP) groups as well as across the sample. The BAP group (n = 45) performed worse than the Non-BAP group (n = 102) on the unexpected outcomes test (UOT), but groups were similar regarding reading the mind in the eyes test (RMET). Stepwise regression indicated RMET best predicted UOT for the BAP group; block design best predicted UOT in the Non-BAP group. BAP traits did not mediate the relation of RMET to UOT performance. While RMET and UOT appear similarly related in BAP/Non-BAP samples, use of emotion recognition abilities in a cognitive ToM task may reflect over-reliance on this skill in the BAP.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N