Communicating with Slurs.

An adequate linguistic theory of slurs must address three major aspects of their meaning: descriptive, evaluative and expressive. Slurs denote specific groups, they are used to convey speakers' evaluative attitudes, and some have a very strong emotional impact. In this paper, I argue that a variety...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 69; no. 277; pp. 795 - 817
Autor principal: Rappaport, Jesse
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Oct2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:An adequate linguistic theory of slurs must address three major aspects of their meaning: descriptive, evaluative and expressive. Slurs denote specific groups, they are used to convey speakers' evaluative attitudes, and some have a very strong emotional impact. In this paper, I argue that a variety of mechanisms are required to account for this range of properties. Semantically, slurs simply denote the groups that they target. Pragmatically, speakers use slurs to show, in the Relevance-Theoretic sense, that they share a negative attitude towards the targeted group. However, this does not yet explain the capacity of certain 'toxic' slurs to express strong emotions of the speaker and to elicit a strong emotional reaction in hearers. In order to account for this psychological impact, I posit that, like curse words, slurs undergo distinct neurolinguistic processing that links them directly to emotional centers in the brain.