ŠMĖKLIŠKAS SUBJEKTAS: DIFFÉRANCE (A/E)FEKTAI.
This article is a response to Derrida's encouragement to "rehabilitate" the subject of Western philosophy. Because of that, on the one hand, the article offers a critique and revision of the classical concept of the subject; on the other hand, it attempts to (re)construct the alternative notion of t...
| Publicado en: | Athena: Filosofijos studijos no. 13; pp. 35 - 57 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Lithuanian Culture Research Institute
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=138848578&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 138848578 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 18225047 86AP jtl: Athena: Filosofijos studijos issn: 18225047 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2018 iid: 13 pid: 49199 pub: Lithuanian Culture Research Institute artinfo: ui: 138848578 ppf: 35 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.6MB tig: atl: ŠMĖKLIŠKAS SUBJEKTAS: DIFFÉRANCE (A/E)FEKTAI. aug: au: Petrina, Denis affil: Lietuvos kultūros tyrimų institutas Saltoniškių g. 58, LT-08105 Vilnius sug: keyword: affect specter subject supplement šmėkla afektas affect Deleuze Derrida différance pakaitalas specter subject subjektas supplement ab: This article is a response to Derrida's encouragement to "rehabilitate" the subject of Western philosophy. Because of that, on the one hand, the article offers a critique and revision of the classical concept of the subject; on the other hand, it attempts to (re)construct the alternative notion of the subject. To achieve these goals, the potential of Derridean poststructuralism and affect theory (mostly its Deleuzian version) is employed. Those two philosophical approaches are viewed as questioning (each in a different manner) the traditional concept of the subject as well as endeavors to develop a new and original one. The critique/revision of the concept of the subject is implemented from three perspectives: conceptual, phenomenological and ontological. By such a "mixed" approach, it is attempted to demonstrate that, despite theoretical, conceptual and practical differences, poststructuralism and affect theory generally identify the same problematical areas of the classical notion of the subject. Šis straipsnis - atsakas į Derrida raginimą „reabilituoti" Vakarų filosofijos subjektą. Todėl, viena vertus, straipsnyje yra vykdoma klasikinės subjekto sąvokos interpretacijos kritika ir revizija, kita vertus - (re)konstruojama alternatyvi subjekto samprata. Šioms užduotims atlikti pasitelkiamas deridiško poststruktūralizmo ir afekto teorijos (daugiausia delioziškos versijos) potencialas - kaip dviejų filosofinių prieigų, skirtingais būdais kvestionuojančių tradicinę subjekto sampratą ir sykiu plėtojančių originalią subjekto koncepciją. Subjekto sąvokos kritika / revizija vykdoma trimis kryptimis: konceptualine, fenomenologine ir ontologine. Tokia „mišria" prieiga bandoma įrodyti, jog, nepaisant teorinių, konceptualinių ir praktinių skirtumų, poststruktūralizmas ir afekto teorija iš esmės aptinka tuos pačius klasikinės subjekto sąvokos probleminius mazgus. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Athena: Filosofijos studijos is the property of Lithuanian Culture Research Institute and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Athena: Filosofijos studijos holder: Lithuanian Culture Research Institute dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|