Consequentialism and Thought Experiments in Philosophy Comes to Dinner.
In this article, I review Philosophy Comes to Dinner, examining some of its persistent metaethical issues, especially some potentially controversial assumptions made by the authors and the tendency found in some to treat thought experiments as empirical experiments. The book covers arguments for dif...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Animal Ethics Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 212 - 220 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Illinois Press
Fall2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=138873037&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 138873037 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 21565414 BFVH jtl: Journal of Animal Ethics issn: 21565414 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2019 vid: 9 iid: 2 pid: 416 pub: University of Illinois Press artinfo: ui: 138873037 10.5406/janimalethics.9.2.0212 ppf: 212 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 246KB tig: atl: Consequentialism and Thought Experiments in Philosophy Comes to Dinner. aug: au: Lazo, Robert affil: Oxford Centre for Animal Ethics, Oxford, England su: Thought experiments Feminist ethics Philosophy Argument sug: subj: Thought experiments Feminist ethics Philosophy Argument ab: In this article, I review Philosophy Comes to Dinner, examining some of its persistent metaethical issues, especially some potentially controversial assumptions made by the authors and the tendency found in some to treat thought experiments as empirical experiments. The book covers arguments for different diets, the causal efficacy argument (i.e. the argument that individual food choices do not change societal food practices), feminist food ethics, harms of the food system, locavorism, and other topics. The causal efficacy argument, while not a part of all chapters in the book, is its focus, with authors arguing for and against it, and for and against various interpretations of its ethical consequences. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of Animal Ethics is the property of University of Illinois Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of Animal Ethics holder: University of Illinois Press dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|