Heritage making through community archaeology and the spatial humanities.
The archaeology of postindustrial landscapes is still relatively undeveloped. The impact of economic, social, and urban development efforts on both tangible and intangible heritage complicate our attempts to understand these places. Despite this, integrating heritage practice and promotion into the...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage Vol. 6; no. 4; pp. 238 - 257 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=138964531&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 138964531 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 20518196 H6UF jtl: Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage issn: 20518196 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2019 vid: 6 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 138964531 10.1080/20518196.2019.1653516 ppf: 238 ppct: 19 formats: tig: atl: Heritage making through community archaeology and the spatial humanities. aug: au: Trepal, Dan Scarlett, Sarah Fayen Lafreniere, Don affil: Department of Social Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA sug: keyword: archaeology GIS heritage Postindustrial spatial humanities ab: The archaeology of postindustrial landscapes is still relatively undeveloped. The impact of economic, social, and urban development efforts on both tangible and intangible heritage complicate our attempts to understand these places. Despite this, integrating heritage practice and promotion into the regeneration of a postindustrial landscape continues to grow in popularity. Within this context, genuine public-expert collaboration is the most effective means towards developing a sustainable compromise between protecting community heritage values and fostering economic development and regeneration. In this paper, we suggest three broad categories of challenges for studying and promoting heritage in postindustrial regions – physical, social, and political – and propose a digital data-focused geospatial approach to how community archaeologists and heritage specialists may overcome these challenges. We argue that coupling this data and technology with a robust research agenda and public programming can serve as a crucial two-way link, enabling long-term sustainable heritage-promotion and protection in post-industrial communities. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|