What Do We Mean When We Talk About Transparency? Toward Meaningful Transparency in Commercial Content Moderation.

This article seeks to provide greater specificity to demands for transparency in the commercial content moderation practices of digital platforms. We identify gaps in knowledge through a thematic analysis of 380 survey responses from individuals who have been the subject of content moderation decisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Communication (19328036) Vol. 13; pp. 1526 - 1544
Autores principales: SUZOR, NICOLAS P., WEST, SARAH MYERS, QUODLING, ANDREW, YORK, JILLIAN
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Southern California, USC Annenberg Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=139171776&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 139171776
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        19328036
        3836
      jtl: International Journal of Communication (19328036)
      issn: 19328036
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2019
      vid: 13
      pid: 16336
      pub: University of Southern California, USC Annenberg Press
    artinfo:
      ui: 139171776
      ppf: 1526
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: What Do We Mean When We Talk About Transparency? Toward Meaningful Transparency in Commercial Content Moderation.
      aug:
        au:
          SUZOR, NICOLAS P.
          WEST, SARAH MYERS
          QUODLING, ANDREW
          YORK, JILLIAN
        affil:
          Queensland University of Technology, Australia
          AI Now Institute, USA
          Electronic Frontier Foundation, USA
      su:
        Civil society
        Journalists
        Stakeholders
        Thematic analysis
        Government accountability
      sug:
        subj:
          Civil society
          Journalists
          Independent writers and authors
          Independent Artists, Writers, and Performers
          Independent actors, comedians and performers
          Stakeholders
          Thematic analysis
          Government accountability
      keyword:
        content moderation
        due process
        platforms
        transparency
        content moderation
        due process
        platforms
        transparency
      ab: This article seeks to provide greater specificity to demands for transparency in the commercial content moderation practices of digital platforms. We identify gaps in knowledge through a thematic analysis of 380 survey responses from individuals who have been the subject of content moderation decisions. We argue that meaningful transparency should be understood as a component of a communicative process of accountability (rendering account) to independent stakeholders. We make specific recommendations for platforms to provide people with clear information about decisions that affect them, including what content is moderated, which rule was breached, and a description of the people and automated processes responsible for identifying content and making the decision. Beyond providing more information to individuals about particular decisions, however, we note the major challenge of improving understanding of content moderation at a systems level. General demands for greater transparency should be reframed to focus on enhanced access to large-scale disaggregated data that can enable new methods and collaborations among academia, civil society, and journalists to make these systems more understandable and accountable.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N