Responsibility for Killer Robots.

Future weapons will make life-or-death decisions without a human in the loop. When such weapons inflict unwarranted harm, no one appears to be responsible. There seems to be a responsibility gap. I first reconstruct the argument for such responsibility gaps to then argue that this argument is not so...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Ethical Theory & Moral Practice Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 731 - 748
Autor principal: Himmelreich, Johannes
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=139186804&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 139186804
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13862820
        OEY
      jtl: Ethical Theory & Moral Practice
      issn: 13862820
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2019
      vid: 22
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        139186804
        10.1007/s10677-019-10007-9
      ppf: 731
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 360KB
      tig:
        atl: Responsibility for Killer Robots.
      aug:
        au: Himmelreich, Johannes
        affil: McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society, Stanford University, 450 Serra Mall, 94305, Stanford, CA, USA
      su:
        Weapons
        Ethics
        Responsibility
        Artificial intelligence
        Governmental investigations
      sug:
        subj:
          Weapons
          Ethics
          Responsibility
          Artificial intelligence
          Governmental investigations
      keyword:
        Causation
        Hierarchical groups
        Moral philosophy
        Moral responsibility
        Responsibility gap
      ab: Future weapons will make life-or-death decisions without a human in the loop. When such weapons inflict unwarranted harm, no one appears to be responsible. There seems to be a responsibility gap. I first reconstruct the argument for such responsibility gaps to then argue that this argument is not sound. The argument assumes that commanders have no control over whether autonomous weapons inflict harm. I argue against this assumption. Although this investigation concerns a specific case of autonomous weapons systems, I take steps towards vindicating the more general idea that superiors can be morally responsible in virtue of being in command.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Ethical Theory & Moral Practice is a copyright of Springer, 2019. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Ethical Theory & Moral Practice
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N