Developing a 'moral compass tool' based on moral case deliberations: A pragmatic hermeneutic approach to clinical ethics.
Although moral case deliberation (MCD) is evaluated positively as a form of clinical ethics support (CES), it has limitations. To address these limitations our research objective was to develop a thematic CES tool. In order to assess the philosophical characteristics of a CES tool based on MCDs, we...
| Publicado en: | Bioethics Vol. 33; no. 9; pp. 1012 - 1022 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Nov2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=139230566&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 139230566 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699702 6PJ jtl: Bioethics issn: 02699702 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov2019 vid: 33 iid: 9 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 139230566 10.1111/bioe.12617 ppf: 1012 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: Developing a 'moral compass tool' based on moral case deliberations: A pragmatic hermeneutic approach to clinical ethics. aug: au: Hartman, Laura Metselaar, Suzanne Widdershoven, Guy Molewijk, Bert affil: Department of Medical Humanities, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands Centre for Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, Norway su: Ethics Phenomenology Medical ethics Medical practice Ethical decision making sug: subj: Ethics Phenomenology Medical ethics Medical practice Ethical decision making keyword: clinical ethics support ethics support tool hermeneutics methodology moral case deliberation pragmatism theoretical reflection clinical ethics support ethics support tool hermeneutics methodology moral case deliberation pragmatism theoretical reflection ab: Although moral case deliberation (MCD) is evaluated positively as a form of clinical ethics support (CES), it has limitations. To address these limitations our research objective was to develop a thematic CES tool. In order to assess the philosophical characteristics of a CES tool based on MCDs, we drew on hermeneutic ethics and pragmatism. We distinguished four core characteristics of a CES tool: (a) focusing on an actual situation that is experienced as morally challenging by the user; (b) stimulating moral inquiry into the moral concepts, questions and routines in the lived experience of the CES tool user; (c) stimulating moral learning by exploring other perspectives; and (d) incorporating contextual details. We provide an example of a CES tool developed for moral dilemmas over client autonomy. Our article ends with some reflections on the normativity of the CES tool, other application areas and the importance of evaluation studies of CES tools. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|