CT compared to MRI for functional evaluation of the right ventricle: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: Right ventricular function (RVF) is a strong predictor of adverse cardiac events; however, the reference standard for RVF assessment, MRI, is limited in some patients for whom accurate evaluation of RVF is essential, like those with COPD or non-MR compatible metal implants. We conducted t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 29; no. 12; pp. 6816 - 6829
Autores principales: Fu, Hang, Wang, Xuedong, Diao, Kaiyue, Huang, Shan, Liu, Hui, Gao, Yue, Zhao, Qin, Yang, Zhi-gang, Guo, Ying-kun
Formato: meta analysis research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=139479344&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 139479344
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2019
      vid: 29
      iid: 12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        139479344
        139479344
        NLM31134368
        139479344
        10.1007/s00330-019-06228-2
        NLM31134368
        139479344
      ppf: 6816
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: CT compared to MRI for functional evaluation of the right ventricle: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
      aug:
        au:
          Fu, Hang
          Wang, Xuedong
          Diao, Kaiyue
          Huang, Shan
          Liu, Hui
          Gao, Yue
          Zhao, Qin
          Yang, Zhi-gang
          Guo, Ying-kun
        affil: Department of Radiology, Key Laboratory of Obstetric & Gynecologic and Pediatric Diseases and Birth Defects of Ministry of Education, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, 20# Section 3 South Renmin Road, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
      sug:
        subj:
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Heart Ventricle
          Ventricular Dysfunction, Right
          Female
          Ventricular Function, Right
          Male
          Middle Age
          Stroke Volume
          Human
          Meta Analysis
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Funding Source
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objective: Right ventricular function (RVF) is a strong predictor of adverse cardiac events; however, the reference standard for RVF assessment, MRI, is limited in some patients for whom accurate evaluation of RVF is essential, like those with COPD or non-MR compatible metal implants. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate whether CT was as accurate as MRI for the assessment of RVF.Method: We conducted a meta-analysis of studies retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central searches to evaluate the differences and correlations between the following RVF parameters as measured by CT and MRI: end diastole volume (EDV), end systole volume (ESV), right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF), and stroke volume (SV).Results: Sixteen studies that used disk summation (637 subjects) and three studies that used three-dimensional reconstruction were included. For the 16 studies, the pooled standard mean differences (95% confidence interval) were 1.04 (- 2.59, 4.67) for EDV, 1.22 (1.50, 3.95) for ESV, - 0.65 (- 2.60, 1.29) for RVEF, and - 0.37 (- 3.64, 2.90) for SV. The overall correlation coefficient (r) values were 0.98 for EDV, 0.95 for ESV, 0.98 for RVEF, and 0.97 for SV. The mean difference between the two methods was not statistically significant (overall effect Z test, p > 0.1).Conclusion: CT can assess RVF with accuracy comparable to that of MRI. Thus, CT is a valid alternative to MRI.Key Points: • CT could help clinicians to assess RVF as accurately as MRI can, with satisfactory repeatability.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N