Liver CT perfusion: which is the relevant delay that reduces radiation dose and maintains diagnostic accuracy?

Objectives: High radiation dose during CT perfusion (CTp) studies contributes to prevent CTp application in daily clinical practice. This work evaluates the consequences of scan delay on perfusion parameters and provides guidelines to help reducing the radiation dose by choosing the most appropriate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 29; no. 12; pp. 6550 - 6559
Autores principales: Bevilacqua, Alessandro, Malavasi, Silvia, Vilgrain, Valérie
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=139479356&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 139479356
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2019
      vid: 29
      iid: 12
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        139479356
        139479356
        NLM31115620
        139479356
        10.1007/s00330-019-06259-9
        NLM31115620
        139479356
      ppf: 6550
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Liver CT perfusion: which is the relevant delay that reduces radiation dose and maintains diagnostic accuracy?
      aug:
        au:
          Bevilacqua, Alessandro
          Malavasi, Silvia
          Vilgrain, Valérie
        affil: DISI (Department of Computer Science and Engineering), University of Bologna, Viale Risorgimento, 2, I-40136, Bologna, Italy
      sug:
        subj:
          Liver
          Radiation Dosage
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed Methods
          Colorectal Neoplasms Pathology
          Middle Age
          Reproducibility of Results
          Prospective Studies
          Aged
          Human
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Male
          Perfusion Imaging
          Female
          Contrast Media
          Adult
          Time
          Image Enhancement Methods
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Funding Source
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objectives: High radiation dose during CT perfusion (CTp) studies contributes to prevent CTp application in daily clinical practice. This work evaluates the consequences of scan delay on perfusion parameters and provides guidelines to help reducing the radiation dose by choosing the most appropriate delay.Methods: Fifty-nine patients (34 men, 25 women; mean age 68 ± 12) with colorectal cancer, without underlying liver disease, underwent liver CTp, with the acquisition starting simultaneously with iodinated contrast agent injection. Blood flow (BF) and hepatic perfusion index (HPI) were computed on the acquired examinations and compared with those of the same examinations when a variable scan delay (τ) is introduced. Dose length product, CT dose index, and effective dose were also computed on original and delayed examinations.Results: Altogether, three groups of delays (τ ≤ 4 s, 5 s ≤ τ ≤ 9 s, τ ≥ 10 s) were identified, yielding increasing radiation dose saving (RDS) (RDS ≤ 9.5%, 11.9% ≤ RDS ≤ 21.4%, RDS ≥ 23.8%) and decreasing perfusion accuracy (high (τ ≤ 4 s), medium (5 s ≤ τ ≤ 9 s), low (τ ≥ 10 s)). In particular, single-input and arterial BF and HPI were more insensitive to delay as regards the absolute variations (only 1 ml/min/100 g and 1%, respectively, for τ ≤ 9 s), than portal and total BF.Conclusion: Using delays lower than 4 s does not change perfusion accuracy and conveys unnecessary dose to patients. Conversely, starting the acquisition 9 s after contrast agent injection yields a RDS of about 21%, with no significant losses in perfusion accuracy.Key Points: • Scan delays lower than 4 s do not alter perfusion accuracy and deliver an unnecessary radiation dose to patients. • Radiation dose delivered to patients can be reduced by 21.4% by introducing a 9-s scan delay, while keeping accurate perfusion values. • Using scan delays higher than 10 s, some perfusion parameters (portal and total BF) were inaccurate.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N