Promoting nursing research globally: the writing to improve nursing science (WINS) program.
Aim: To test the feasibility of a remote writing programme, Writing to Improve Nursing Science (WINS), for nursing scholars in low‐ and middle‐income countries and assess its impact on scholarly writing and dissemination. Background: The ability to write and publish scholarly manuscripts is critical...
| Publicado en: | International Nursing Review Vol. 66; no. 4; pp. 541 - 549 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Dec2019
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=139644335&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 139644335 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 00208132 81B jtl: International Nursing Review issn: 00208132 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2019 vid: 66 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 139644335 139644335 139644335 10.1111/inr.12552 139644335 ppf: 541 ppct: 8 formats: tig: atl: Promoting nursing research globally: the writing to improve nursing science (WINS) program. aug: au: Sun, Carolyn Kulage, Kristine M. Al‐Touby, Salem Nyamakura, Rudo Larson, Elaine affil: Hunter College, New York NY, USA sug: subj: Research, Nursing Nursing Science Writing for Publication Program Development Low and Middle Income Countries Human Mentorship Manuscripts Seminars and Workshops Peer Review Open-Ended Questionnaires Grants Funding Source ab: Aim: To test the feasibility of a remote writing programme, Writing to Improve Nursing Science (WINS), for nursing scholars in low‐ and middle‐income countries and assess its impact on scholarly writing and dissemination. Background: The ability to write and publish scholarly manuscripts is critical for successful nursing research careers. Yet, there is a lack of resources to appropriately mentor nurse scholars in this area. This is especially true for low‐ and middle‐income countries with fewer resources and a dearth of doctorally prepared nursing faculty. Introduction: We adapted an existing university‐based writing class to mentor 10 nurse scientists through the writing and publication process utilizing three components: online didactic training, remote one‐to‐one mentorship and an in‐person peer‐reviewed writing workshop. Methods: Ten nurse faculty from 10 countries selected via competitive application developed manuscripts with remote mentorship and online training for 6 months. Then, an in‐person workshop was held to conduct peer reviews of manuscripts. Mentorship continued for an additional year until the manuscript was either published or the participant no longer wished to pursue publication. Results: All participants prepared a manuscript and were trained in manuscript writing, editing, and the peer review and submission process. To date, four manuscripts have been published. Discussion: The Writing to Improve Nursing Science Program is a feasible model to increase publications among nursing faculty or students globally and allow the sharing of resources across countries. Conclusion and implications for nursing policy: Innovative solutions for sharing of intellectual resources, such as this program may contribute to improving the evidence base globally. Nursing research policies should include a mentorship component to increase publications to improve nursing practice and related patient outcomes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|