Visual vs. computer-based computed tomography analysis for the identification of functional patterns in interstitial lung diseases.

Purpose Of Review: Computer algorithms possess an intrinsic speed, objectivity, reproducibility and scalability unmatched by visual quantitation methods performed by trained readers. The question of how well quantitative CT (QCT) analysis methods compare with visual CT analysis to predict functional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Vol. 25; no. 5; pp. 426 - 434
Autores principales: Procter, Alexander J., Jacob, Joseph
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Sep2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=139711495&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 139711495
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10705287
        IQZ
      jtl: Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine
      issn: 10705287
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2019
      vid: 25
      iid: 5
      pid: 433
      pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
      place: Baltimore, Maryland
    artinfo:
      ui:
        139711495
        139711495
        NLM31033636
        10.1097/MCP.0000000000000589
        NLM31033636
        139711495
      ppf: 426
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Visual vs. computer-based computed tomography analysis for the identification of functional patterns in interstitial lung diseases.
      aug:
        au:
          Procter, Alexander J.
          Jacob, Joseph
      sug:
      ab: Purpose Of Review: Computer algorithms possess an intrinsic speed, objectivity, reproducibility and scalability unmatched by visual quantitation methods performed by trained readers. The question of how well quantitative CT (QCT) analysis methods compare with visual CT analysis to predict functional status in fibrosing lung diseases (FLDs) is of increasing relevance to understand the future role QCT may have in prognostication of FLD.Recent Findings: The latest computer algorithms demonstrate improved performance over visual CT analysis in predicting baseline disease severity as measured by correlations with functional indices of lung damage. QCT analysis may, therefore, have a role in aiding clinical decision-making as well as in the enrichment of drug trial populations. Quantitative analysis on longitudinal CTs has also shown better correlations with changes in functional indices whenever compared with visual scores of change suggesting the potential of QCT analysis as an imaging biomarker of disease progression in FLD. Importantly, computer algorithms are now able to identify prognostic imaging biomarkers that cannot be quantified visually (e.g. vessel-related structures).Summary: QCT holds great promise for the evaluation of damage in FLD. Challenges for QCT include accommodating measurement noise from variation in CT acquisition techniques and developing patient-friendly visualizations of quantitative outputs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N