Examining gender differences in reintegrative shaming theory: the role of shame acknowledgment.
Reintegrative shaming theory operates on the assumption that shaming from important others is gendered: women are more likely than men to conform and desist from offending. This study examines the validity of this assumption using measures of parent shame, peer shame, and shame acknowledgment to det...
| Publicado en: | Crime, Law & Social Change Vol. 72; no. 5; pp. 527 - 547 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Dec2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=139721870&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 139721870 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 09254994 CRG jtl: Crime, Law & Social Change issn: 09254994 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2019 vid: 72 iid: 5 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 139721870 10.1007/s10611-019-09835-8 ppf: 527 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 428KB tig: atl: Examining gender differences in reintegrative shaming theory: the role of shame acknowledgment. aug: au: Fitch, Chivon H. Nazaretian, Zavin affil: Department of Criminology, Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP), 411 North Walk, 15705, Indiana, PA, USA Department of Criminology, Adrian College, 110 South Madison, 49221, Adrian, MI, USA su: Shame Role theory Gender sug: subj: Shame Role theory Gender ab: Reintegrative shaming theory operates on the assumption that shaming from important others is gendered: women are more likely than men to conform and desist from offending. This study examines the validity of this assumption using measures of parent shame, peer shame, and shame acknowledgment to determine the impact of shame on offending and conformity. Using waves six and seven of the National Youth Survey Family Study data, zero-inflated negative binomial modeling is employed to examine the impact of reintegrative shaming on female and male offending and non-offending behavior among a probability sample of adults (N = 1227). Parent shaming is not a significant predictor of offending, but peer shaming is influential. The relationship between gender and conformity was mediated by shame acknowledgement. Although the reintegrative shaming process is not as influential as the theory had predicted, the importance of shame for explaining prevalence in women is demonstrated. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|