When user-centered design meets implementation science: integrating provider perspectives in the development of an intimate partner violence intervention for women treated in the United States' largest integrated healthcare system.

Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a global health problem that is a substantial source of human suffering. Within the United States (US), women veterans are at high risk for experiencing IPV. There is an urgent need for feasible, acceptable, and patient-centered IPV counse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Women's Health Vol. 19; no. 1
Autores principales: Danitz, Sara B., Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey, Grillo, Alessandra R., Dichter, Melissa E., Driscoll, Mary, Gerber, Megan R., Gregor, Kristin, Hamilton, Alison B., Iverson, Katherine M.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 11/27/2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=139865557&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 139865557
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14726874
        1CIP
      jtl: BMC Women's Health
      issn: 14726874
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 11/27/2019
      vid: 19
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        139865557
        139865557
        NLM31771557
        139865557
        10.1186/s12905-019-0837-8
        NLM31771557
        139865557
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: When user-centered design meets implementation science: integrating provider perspectives in the development of an intimate partner violence intervention for women treated in the United States' largest integrated healthcare system.
      aug:
        au:
          Danitz, Sara B.
          Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey
          Grillo, Alessandra R.
          Dichter, Melissa E.
          Driscoll, Mary
          Gerber, Megan R.
          Gregor, Kristin
          Hamilton, Alison B.
          Iverson, Katherine M.
        affil: Women's Health Sciences Division of the National Center for PTSD (116B-3), VA Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, 02130, Boston, MA, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Women's Health
          Counseling Methods
          Veterans Psychosocial Factors
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Health Care Delivery, Integrated Standards
          Qualitative Studies
          United States Department of Veterans Affairs
          United States
          Female
          Adult
          Health Care Delivery, Integrated Administration
          Program Evaluation
          Human
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Scales
          Social Readjustment Rating Scale
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
      ab: Background: Intimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a global health problem that is a substantial source of human suffering. Within the United States (US), women veterans are at high risk for experiencing IPV. There is an urgent need for feasible, acceptable, and patient-centered IPV counseling interventions for the growing number of women treated in the US's largest integrated healthcare system, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Implementation science and user-centered-design (UCD) can play an important role in accelerating the research-to-practice pipeline. Recovering from IPV through Strengths and Empowerment (RISE) is a flexible, patient-centered, modular-based program that holds promise as a brief counseling intervention for women veterans treated in VHA. We utilized a UCD approach to develop and refine RISE (prior to formal effectiveness evaluations) by soliciting early feedback from the providers where the intervention will ultimately be implemented. The current study reports on the feedback from VHA providers that was used to tailor and refine RISE.Method: We conducted and analyzed semi-structured, key-informant interviews with VHA providers working in clinics relevant to the delivery of IPV interventions (n = 23) at two large medical centers in the US. Participants' mean age was 42.6 years (SD = 11.6), they were predominately female (91.3%) and from a variety of relevant disciplines (39.1% psychologists, 21.7% social workers, 17.4% physicians, 8.7% registered nurses, 4.3% psychiatrists, 4.3% licensed marriage and family therapists, 4.3% peer specialists). We conducted rapid content analysis using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.Results: Providers perceived RISE as highly acceptable and feasible, noting strengths including RISE's structure, patient-centered agenda, and facilitation of provider comfort in addressing IPV. Researchers identified themes related to content and context modifications, including requests for additional safety check-ins, structure for goal-setting, and suggestions for how to develop and implement RISE-specific trainings.Conclusions: These findings have guided refinements to RISE prior to formal effectiveness testing in VHA. We discuss implications for the use of UCD in intervention development and refinement for interventions addressing IPV and other trauma in health care settings globally.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03261700; Date of registration: 8/25/2017, date of enrollment of first participant in trial: 10/22/2018. Unique Protocol ID: IIR 16-062.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N