Computational text analysis within the Humanities: How to combine working practices from the contributing fields?
This position paper is based on a keynote presentation at the COLING 2016 Workshop on Language Technology for Digital Humanities in Osaka, Japan. It departs from observations about working practices in Humanities disciplines following a hermeneutic tradition of text interpretation versus the method-...
| Published in: | Language Resources & Evaluation Vol. 53; no. 4; pp. 565 - 603 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Dec2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=139882010&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 139882010 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1574020X 179V jtl: Language Resources & Evaluation issn: 1574020X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Dec2019 vid: 53 iid: 4 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 139882010 10.1007/s10579-019-09459-3 ppf: 565 ppct: 38 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 2MB tig: atl: Computational text analysis within the Humanities: How to combine working practices from the contributing fields? aug: au: Kuhn, Jonas affil: Institute for Natural Language Processing (IMS), University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany su: Employee rules Digital humanities Task analysis Literary interpretation Computational linguistics Patience Osaka (Japan) sug: subj: Osaka (Japan) Employee rules Digital humanities Task analysis Literary interpretation Computational linguistics Patience keyword: Adaptation of NLP tool chains Interdisciplinary working practice ab: This position paper is based on a keynote presentation at the COLING 2016 Workshop on Language Technology for Digital Humanities in Osaka, Japan. It departs from observations about working practices in Humanities disciplines following a hermeneutic tradition of text interpretation versus the method-oriented research strategies in Computational Linguistics (CL). The respective praxeological traditions are quite different. Yet more and more researchers are willing to open up towards truly transdisciplinary collaborations, trying to exploit advanced methods from CL within research that ultimately addresses questions from the traditional Humanities disciplines and the Social Sciences. The article identifies two central workflow-related issues for this type of collaborative project in the Digital Humanities (DH) and Computational Social Science: (1) a scheduling dilemma, which affects the point in the course of the project when specifications of the core analysis task are fixed (as early as possible from the computational perspective, but as late as possible from the Humanities perspective) and (2) the subjectivity problem, which concerns the degree of intersubjective stability of the target categories of analysis. CL methodology demands high inter-annotator agreement and theory-independent categories, while the categories in hermeneutic reasoning are often tied to a particular interpretive approach (viz. a theory of literary interpretation) and may bear a non-trivial relation to a reader's pre-understanding. Building a comprehensive methodological framework that helps overcome these issues requires considerable time and patience. The established computational methodology has to be gradually opened up to more hermeneutically oriented research questions; resources and tools for the relevant categories of analysis have to be constructed. This article does not call into question that well-targeted efforts along this path are worthwhile. Yet, it makes the following additional programmatic point regarding directions for future research: It might be fruitful to explore—in parallel—the potential lying in DH-specific variants of the concept of rapid prototyping from Software Engineering. To get an idea of how computational analysis of some aspect of text might contribute to a hermeneutic research question, a prototypical analysis model is constructed, e.g., from related data collections and analysis categories, using transfer techniques. While the initial quality of analysis may be limited, the idea of rapid probing allows scholars to explore how the analysis fits in an actual workflow on the target text data and it can thus provide early feedback for the process of refining the modeling. If the rapid probing method can indeed be incorporated in a hermeneutic framework to the satisfaction of well-disposed Humanities scholars, a swifter exploration of alternative paths of analysis would become possible. This may generate considerable additional momentum for transdisciplinary integration. It is as yet too early to point to truly Humanities-oriented examples of the proposed rapid probing technique. To nevertheless make the programmatic idea more concrete, the article uses two experimental scenarios to argue how rapid probing might help addressing the scheduling dilemma and the subjectivity problem respectively. The first scenario illustrates the transfer of complex analysis pipelines across corpora; the second one addresses rapid annotation experiments targeting character mentions in literary text. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Language Resources & Evaluation is a copyright of Springer, 2019. All Rights Reserved. item: Language Resources & Evaluation holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|