Asymmetrical Conversations: Acts of Subordination and the Authority Problem.
According to Mitchell Green , speech act theory traditionally idealizes away from crucial aspects of conversational contexts, including those in which the speaker's social position affects the possibility of her performing certain speech acts. In recent times, asymmetries in communicative situations...
| Publicado en: | Grazer Philosophische Studien Vol. 96; no. 3; pp. 401 - 419 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
Sep2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=139907105&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 139907105 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01659227 NFG jtl: Grazer Philosophische Studien issn: 01659227 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2019 vid: 96 iid: 3 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 139907105 10.1163/18756735-09603010 ppf: 401 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 224KB tig: atl: Asymmetrical Conversations: Acts of Subordination and the Authority Problem. aug: au: Bianchi, Claudia affil: Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele su: Social status Communicative action Social role Standing position Hate speech Social order sug: subj: Social status Communicative action Social role Standing position Hate speech Social order keyword: authority discursive injustice hate speech illocutionary distortion speech act theory ab: According to Mitchell Green , speech act theory traditionally idealizes away from crucial aspects of conversational contexts, including those in which the speaker's social position affects the possibility of her performing certain speech acts. In recent times, asymmetries in communicative situations have become a lively object of study for linguists, philosophers of language and moral philosophers: several scholars view hate speech itself in terms of speech acts, namely acts of subordination (acts establishing or reinforcing unfair hierarchies). The aim of this paper is to address one of the main objections to accounts of hate speech in terms of illocutionary speech acts, that is the Authority Problem. While the social role of the speaker is the focus of several approaches (Langton 2018a, 2018b ; Maitra 2012 ; Kukla 2014 ; Green 2014, 2017a, 2017b), the social role of the audience has too often been neglected. The author will show that not only must the speaker have a certain kind of standing or social position in order to perform speech acts of subordination, but also the audience must typically have a certain kind of standing or social position in order to either license or object to the speaker's authority, and her acts of subordination. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Grazer Philosophische Studien is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Grazer Philosophische Studien holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|