Subjektas ir tikrovė: etinės A. Badiou filosofijos implikacijos.
Alain Badiou’s theory of ethics of the subject implies that the individual interpellation of the symbolic plane could be secondary to the truth process, which grounds the formation of the subject. We arrive at the hypothesis that the subject of the interpellation is already a subject of truth when t...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 96; pp. 71 - 83 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=140098570&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 140098570 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2019 vid: 96 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 140098570 10.15388/Problemos.96.6 ppf: 71 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 1.8MB tig: atl: Subjektas ir tikrovė: etinės A. Badiou filosofijos implikacijos. aug: au: Pocius, Kasparas affil: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto Filosofijos ir socialinės kritikos katedra. su: Badiou, Alain, 1937- Possibility Idealism Ethics Dialectic Struggle Truth Materialism sug: subj: Badiou, Alain, 1937- Possibility Idealism Ethics Dialectic Struggle Truth Materialism keyword: Alain Badiou drive interpellation the Real the subject Alainas Badiou interpeliacija subjektas tikrovė vara ab: Alain Badiou’s theory of ethics of the subject implies that the individual interpellation of the symbolic plane could be secondary to the truth process, which grounds the formation of the subject. We arrive at the hypothesis that the subject of the interpellation is already a subject of truth when the symbolic interpellation process starts. In the paper, two contemporary ethical orientations are emphasized: democratic materialism, which comprises the idealism created by market laws, and a materialist dialectic, which opens the possibility of the subject’s formation during the struggles. However, Badiou’s attempts to create an alternative symbolic plane – a historical plane – do not seem reassuring; therefore, one must look at the event-producing-history from the psychoanalytical perspective. The theory of drives opens the possibility to relate Badiou’s subject to the repressed real, to show him as immune to the desire, which may be derived from a symbolical plane, and able to ground his struggles with revolutionary jouissance while not allowing history to end too early. Šiame straipsnyje gilinamasi į Alaino Badiou filosofijoje plėtojamas etines sampratas. Kodėl šiuolaikiniame materializme iškyla tiesos, ištikimybės ir subjekto kūrimo problema? Keliama hipotezė, kad atsakymas į šį klausimą slypi ne filosofijoje, bet psichoanalizėje – varos mechanizme. Be to, keliama hipotezė, kad Badiou kuriama etika neatsiejama nuo Jacques’o Lacano sukurtų simbolinės ir Tikrovės plotmės koncepcijų. Keliamas klausimas, ar Lacano aptariamame varos mechanizme neslypi etiniai pasirinkimai, kurie Badiou postuluojamo kovingo subjekto laikyseną veikia stipriau nei socialiniai ar galios santykiai? pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|