Newtons Methodologie: Eine Kritik an Duhem, Feyerabend und Lakatos.

The Newtonian research program consists of the core axioms of the Principia Mathematica, a sequence of force laws and auxiliary hypotheses, and a set of methodological rules. The latter underwent several changes and so it is sometimes claimed that, historically seen, Newton and the Newtonians added...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie Vol. 101; no. 4; pp. 584 - 616
Main Author: Feldbacher-Escamilla, Christian J.
Format: Article
Published: De Gruyter Dec2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=140273205&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 140273205
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00039101
        B7X
      jtl: Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie
      issn: 00039101
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2019
      vid: 101
      iid: 4
      pid: 1734
      pub: De Gruyter
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140273205
        10.1515/agph-2019-4004
      ppf: 584
      ppct: 32
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Newtons Methodologie: Eine Kritik an Duhem, Feyerabend und Lakatos.
      aug:
        au: Feldbacher-Escamilla, Christian J.
        affil: Institut für Philosophie, Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsstraße 1, Deutschland Düsseldorf, Deutschland
      su:
        Kepler's laws
        Newton's law of gravitation
        Newton-Raphson method
      sug:
        subj:
          Kepler's laws
          Newton's law of gravitation
          Newton-Raphson method
      ab: The Newtonian research program consists of the core axioms of the Principia Mathematica, a sequence of force laws and auxiliary hypotheses, and a set of methodological rules. The latter underwent several changes and so it is sometimes claimed that, historically seen, Newton and the Newtonians added methodological rules post constructione in order to further support their research agenda. An argument of Duhem, Feyerabend, and Lakatos aims to provide a theoretical reason why Newton could not have come up with his theory of the Principia in accordance with his own methodology: Since Newton's starting point, Kepler's laws, contradict the law of universal gravitation, he could not have applied the so-called method of analysis and synthesis. In this paper, this argument is examined with reference to the Principia's several editions. Newton's method is characterized, and necessary general background assumptions of the argument are made explicit. Finally, the argument is criticized based on a contemporary philosophy of science point of view.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N