The Hard Problem of Theory Choice: A Case Study on Causal Inference and Its Faithfulness Assumption.

The problem of theory choice and model selection is hard but still important when useful truths are underdetermined, perhaps not by all kinds of data but by the kinds of data we can have access to ethically or practicably—even if we have an infinity of such data. This article addresses a crucial ins...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Philosophy of Science Vol. 86; no. 5; pp. 967 - 981
Autor principal: Lin, Hanti
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=140296248&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 140296248
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00318248
        PSC
      jtl: Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00318248
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2019
      vid: 86
      iid: 5
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140296248
        10.1086/705492
      ppf: 967
      ppct: 14
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 1004KB
      tig:
        atl: The Hard Problem of Theory Choice: A Case Study on Causal Inference and Its Faithfulness Assumption.
      aug:
        au: Lin, Hanti
      su:
        Decision theory
        Causal models
        Case studies
        Data science
        Hypothesis
      sug:
        subj:
          Decision theory
          Causal models
          Case studies
          Data science
          Hypothesis
      ab: The problem of theory choice and model selection is hard but still important when useful truths are underdetermined, perhaps not by all kinds of data but by the kinds of data we can have access to ethically or practicably—even if we have an infinity of such data. This article addresses a crucial instance of that problem: the problem of inferring causal structures from nonexperimental, nontemporal data without assuming the so-called causal Faithfulness condition or the like. A new account of epistemic evaluation is developed to solve that problem and justify a standard practice of causal inference in data science.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Philosophy of Science is the property of Cambridge University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Philosophy of Science
      holder: Cambridge University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N