Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the Risks of Mistaken Convictions.

Many oppose the use of profile evidence against defendants at trial, even when the statistical correlations are reliable and the jury is free from prejudice. The literature has struggled to justify this opposition. We argue that admitting profile evidence is objectionable because it violates what we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Ethics Vol. 130; no. 2; pp. 147 - 179
Autores principales: Di Bello, Marcello, O'Neil, Collin
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press Jan2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=140318343&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 140318343
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00141704
        ETH
      jtl: Ethics
      issn: 00141704
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 130
      iid: 2
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140318343
        10.1086/705764
      ppf: 147
      ppct: 32
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
              db: hlh
              ui: 140318343
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              db: hlh
              ui: 140318343
      tig:
        atl: Profile Evidence, Fairness, and the Risks of Mistaken Convictions.
      aug:
        au:
          Di Bello, Marcello
          O'Neil, Collin
      su:
        Prejudices
        Equal rights
        Evidence
        Profile descriptions (Education)
        Statistical correlation
      sug:
        subj:
          Prejudices
          Equal rights
          Evidence
          Profile descriptions (Education)
          Statistical correlation
      ab: Many oppose the use of profile evidence against defendants at trial, even when the statistical correlations are reliable and the jury is free from prejudice. The literature has struggled to justify this opposition. We argue that admitting profile evidence is objectionable because it violates what we call "equal protection"—that is, a right of innocent defendants not to be exposed to higher ex ante risks of mistaken conviction compared to other innocent defendants facing similar charges. We also show why admitting other forms of evidence, such as eyewitness, trace, and motive evidence, does not violate equal protection.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N