Reproductive Life Planning and Contraceptive Action Planning for Privately Insured Women: The MyNewOptions Study.

CONTEXT: Although reproductive life planning (RLP) is recommended in federal and clinical guidelines and may help insured women make personalized contraceptive choices, it has not been systematically evaluated for effectiveness. METHODS: In 2014, some 984 privately insured women aged 18–40 who were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health Vol. 51; no. 4; pp. 219 - 228
Autores principales: Chuang, Cynthia H., Weisman, Carol S., Velott, Diana L., Lehman, Erik, Chinchilli, Vernon M., Francis, Erica B., Moos, Merry‐K., Sciamanna, Christopher N., Armitage, Christopher J., Legro, Richard S.
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2019
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=140371007&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 140371007
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15386341
        K87
      jtl: Perspectives on Sexual & Reproductive Health
      issn: 15386341
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2019
      vid: 51
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140371007
        140371007
        140371007
        10.1363/psrh.12123
        140371007
      ppf: 219
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reproductive Life Planning and Contraceptive Action Planning for Privately Insured Women: The MyNewOptions Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Chuang, Cynthia H.
          Weisman, Carol S.
          Velott, Diana L.
          Lehman, Erik
          Chinchilli, Vernon M.
          Francis, Erica B.
          Moos, Merry‐K.
          Sciamanna, Christopher N.
          Armitage, Christopher J.
          Legro, Richard S.
        affil: Department of Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey PA
      sug:
        subj:
          Patient Centered Care
          Family Planning
          Contraception Utilization
          Decision Making
          Women Psychosocial Factors
          Insurance, Health
          Human
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Adolescence
          Young Adult
          Adult
          Patient Compliance
          Patient Satisfaction
          Self-Efficacy
          Logistic Regression
          Linear Regression
          Data Analysis, Statistical Methods
          Sterilization, Sexual
          Odds Ratio
          Patient Preference
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: CONTEXT: Although reproductive life planning (RLP) is recommended in federal and clinical guidelines and may help insured women make personalized contraceptive choices, it has not been systematically evaluated for effectiveness. METHODS: In 2014, some 984 privately insured women aged 18–40 who were not intending to become pregnant in the next year were randomly assigned to receive RLP, RLP with contraceptive action planning (RLP+) or information only (the control group). Women's contraceptive use, prescription contraceptive use, method adherence, switching to a more effective method, method satisfaction and contraceptive self‐efficacy were assessed at six‐month intervals during the two‐year follow‐up period. Differences between groups were identified using binomial logistic regression, linear regression and generalized estimating equation models. RESULTS: During the follow‐up period, the proportion of women using any contraceptive method increased from 89% to 96%, and the proportion using a long‐acting reversible contraceptive or sterilization increased from 8% to 19%. Contraceptive adherence was high (72–76%) in all three groups. In regression models, the sole significant finding was that women in the RLP+ group were more likely than those in the RLP group to use a prescription method (odds ratio, 1.3). No differences were evident between the intervention groups and the control group in overall contraceptive use, contraceptive adherence, switching to a more effective method, method satisfaction or contraceptive self‐efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The study does not provide evidence that web‐based RLP influences contraceptive behaviors in insured women outside of the clinical setting. Further research is needed to identify strategies to help women of reproductive age identify contraceptive methods that meet their needs and preferences.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N