Understanding quality improvement collaboratives through an implementation science lens.

Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) have long been used to facilitate group learning and implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in healthcare. However, few studies systematically describe implementation strategies linked to QIC success. To address this gap, we evaluated a QIC on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Preventive Medicine Vol. 129
Autores principales: Rohweder, Catherine, Wangen, Mary, Black, Molly, Dolinger, Heather, Wolf, Marti, O'Reilly, Carey, Brandt, Heather, Leeman, Jennifer
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Academic Press Inc. 2019 Supplement
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=140375447&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 140375447
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00917435
        DP9
      jtl: Preventive Medicine
      issn: 00917435
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2019 Supplement
      vid: 129
      pid: 735
      pub: Academic Press Inc.
      place: Burlington, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140375447
        140375447
        NLM31655174
        140375447
        10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105859
        NLM31655174
        140375447
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Understanding quality improvement collaboratives through an implementation science lens.
      aug:
        au:
          Rohweder, Catherine
          Wangen, Mary
          Black, Molly
          Dolinger, Heather
          Wolf, Marti
          O'Reilly, Carey
          Brandt, Heather
          Leeman, Jennifer
        affil: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 200 N. Greensboro St., Suite D-15, Room 212, Carrboro, NC 27510, United States of America
      sug:
        subj:
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Early Detection of Cancer Economics
          Colorectal Neoplasms Mortality
          Colorectal Neoplasms Diagnosis
          Quality Improvement
          Female
          North Carolina
          Middle Age
          Male
          Aged
          Community Health Centers
          Organizational Development
          Human
          Focus Groups
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index
          Impact of Events Scale
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) have long been used to facilitate group learning and implementation of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) in healthcare. However, few studies systematically describe implementation strategies linked to QIC success. To address this gap, we evaluated a QIC on colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) by aligning standardized implementation strategies with collaborative activities and measuring implementation and effectiveness outcomes. In 2018, the American Cancer Society and North Carolina Community Health Center Association provided funding, in-person/virtual training, facilitation, and audit and feedback with the goal of building FQHC capacity to enact selected implementation strategies. The QIC evaluation plan included a pre-test/post-test single group design and mixed methods data collection. We assessed: 1) adoption, 2) engagement, 3) implementation of QI tools and CRC screening EBIs, and 4) changes in CRC screening rates. A post-collaborative focus group captured participants' perceptions of implementation strategies. Twenty-three percent of North Carolina FQHCs (9/40) participated in the collaborative. Health Center engagement was high although individual participation decreased over time. Teams completed all four QIC tools: aim statements, process maps, gap and root cause analysis, and Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. FQHCs increased their uptake of evidence-based CRC screening interventions and rates increased 8.0% between 2017 and 2018. Focus group findings provided insights into participants' opinions regarding the feasibility and appropriateness of the implementation strategies and how they influenced outcomes. Results support the collaborative's positive impact on FQHC capacity to implement QI tools and EBIs to improve CRC screening rates.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N