Banned Books and Publishers' Ploys: The Well of Loneliness as Exemplar.

Archival sources enable us to consider the myriad methods that UK publishers employed to avoid prosecution for obscenity. In turn, UK legal authorities took a collusive (and cosy) approach to obscenity, moving only to prosecute if the book in question generated publicity or achieved wide sales. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Modern Literature Vol. 43; no. 1; pp. 34 - 53
Autor principal: McCleery, Alistair
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Indiana University Press Fall2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=140813059&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 140813059
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        0022281X
        JML
      jtl: Journal of Modern Literature
      issn: 0022281X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Fall2019
      vid: 43
      iid: 1
      pid: 211
      pub: Indiana University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140813059
        10.2979/jmodelite.43.1.03
      ppf: 34
      ppct: 19
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 934KB
      tig:
        atl: Banned Books and Publishers' Ploys: The Well of Loneliness as Exemplar.
      aug:
        au: McCleery, Alistair
        affil: Edinburgh Napier University
      su:
        Banned books
        Publishing
        Loneliness
        Legal authorities
        Newspapers
      sug:
        subj:
          Banned books
          Publishing
          Loneliness
          Legal authorities
          Newspapers
      keyword:
        interwar novels
        Jonathan Cape
        Paris publications
        Radclyffe Hall
        UK obscenity practices
      ab: Archival sources enable us to consider the myriad methods that UK publishers employed to avoid prosecution for obscenity. In turn, UK legal authorities took a collusive (and cosy) approach to obscenity, moving only to prosecute if the book in question generated publicity or achieved wide sales. The Well of Loneliness (1928) by Radclyffe Hall might have passed unseen, except by the intelligentsia, were it not for a fiery denunciation in a popular newspaper. Jonathan Cape, its publisher, equivocated over the novel's withdrawal. His equivocation led to a trial and a ban, and to his undertaking a last resort: publication of the novel in Paris. The case of The Well of Loneliness set the stage for the treatment of other canonical novels of the interwar period, particularly Ulysses (1922) and Lady Chatterley's Lover (1928).
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Modern Literature is the property of Indiana University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Modern Literature
      holder: Indiana University Press
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N