GROBNIČKI PEKTORALNI PRIVJESCI U KONTEKSTU ŽELJEZNODOBNE ESTETIKE SIMBOLA.
Objects, especially decorative ones, play a central role in the mediation of heterogeneous social identities and their dimensions, and jewellery and adornment were, in a way, a symbolical representation of consciousness, thoughts, and form of existence. In the (non)verbal communication of the Iron A...
| Publicado en: | Histria Archaeologica no. 49; pp. 39 - 59 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Arheoloski Muzej Istre u Puli
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | Objects, especially decorative ones, play a central role in the mediation of heterogeneous social identities and their dimensions, and jewellery and adornment were, in a way, a symbolical representation of consciousness, thoughts, and form of existence. In the (non)verbal communication of the Iron Age social structures, the aesthetics of decorating oneself with symbolic jewellery has always served as a mediator of social, ideological, and religious concepts within their narrow community and within more widely accepted trends. The pectoral pendants from Grobnik are conceptually well-designed and artfully presented, and therefore, as a medium of a specific metaphorical message, they are interesting and suitable for new studies and various new understandings. This article, therefore, elaborates on the typological-stylistic analysis, iconographic syntax, comparison, and, where possible, the archaeological context of the pendants, for their better chronological positioning at the end of the Early Iron Age. Although their art expression is essentially reduced to a sign/symbol, semantically speaking, they were extremely powerful. As amulets, talismans, or good luck charms, despite often being rather sketchy and in a fragmented state, they mediated between the present and the past, shaping identities through their physical and metaphysical circulation, which is why their interpretation is presented from different aspects, and with a wider understanding of the Iron Age symbol aesthetics. Predmeti, osobito ukrasni, igraju središnju ulogu u posredovanju heterogenih društvenih identiteta i njihovih razmjera, a nakit i kićenje obilježavali su svojevrsnu simboličku reprezentaciju svijesti, mnijenja, postojanja. U (ne)verbalnoj komunikaciji željeznodobnih društvenih struktura estetika ukrašavanja simboličkim nakitom uvijek je bila posrednikom društvenih, ideoloških i vjerskih koncepata u obrascu njihove uže zajednice i šire prihvaćenih trendova. Grobnički pektoralni privjesci konceptom su dobro osmišljeni i likovno predstavljeni pa su kao medij određene metaforičke poruke specifičnog značenja atraktivni i pogodni za nova istraživanja i različite nove spoznaje. U članku je stoga razrađena tipološko-stilska analiza privjesaka, ikonografska sintaksa, komparacija i, gdje je moguće, arheološki kontekst u svrhu boljeg kronološkog pozicioniranja na kraju starijeg željeznog doba. Premda u osnovi posjeduju reducirani likovni izraz, sažet na znak/simbol, semantički su imali izrazito veliku moć. Kao amuleti, talismani ili amajlije, usprkos fragmentiranosti i nedorečenosti, posredovali su između sadašnjosti i prošlosti, oblikujući identitete svojim fizičkim i metafizičkim optokom pa je i njihova interpretacija ponuđena iz različitih aspekata i u širem shvaćanju željeznodobne estetike simbola. |
|---|