GENERICITY AND RANDOMNESS WITH ITTMS.

We study genericity and randomness with respect to ITTMs, continuing the work initiated by Carl and Schlicht. To do so, we develop a framework to study randomness in the constructible hierarchy. We then answer several of Carl and Schlicht's question. We also ask a new question one the equality of tw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Symbolic Logic Vol. 84; no. 4; pp. 1670 - 1711
Autores principales: MONIN, BENOÎT, D'AURIAC, PAUL-ELLIOT ANGLÈS
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Cambridge University Press Dec2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=140922289&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 140922289
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00224812
        3TY
      jtl: Journal of Symbolic Logic
      issn: 00224812
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2019
      vid: 84
      iid: 4
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        140922289
        10.1017/jsl.2019.62
      ppf: 1670
      ppct: 41
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: GENERICITY AND RANDOMNESS WITH ITTMS.
      aug:
        au:
          MONIN, BENOÎT
          D'AURIAC, PAUL-ELLIOT ANGLÈS
        affil: LACL, DÉPARTEMENT D'INFORMATIQUE FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES ET TECHNOLOGIE 61 AVENUE DU GÉNÉRAL DE GAULLE 94010 CRÉTEIL CEDEX E-mail
      su:
        Algorithmic randomness
        Intuition
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithmic randomness
          Intuition
      keyword:
        03D60
        algorithmic randomness
        constructibles
        forcing
        higher computability
        ITTM
      ab: We study genericity and randomness with respect to ITTMs, continuing the work initiated by Carl and Schlicht. To do so, we develop a framework to study randomness in the constructible hierarchy. We then answer several of Carl and Schlicht's question. We also ask a new question one the equality of two classes of randoms. Although the natural intuition would dictate that the two classes are distinct, we show that things are not as simple as they seem. In particular we show that the categorical analogues of these two classes coincide, in contradiction with the natural intuition. Even though we are not able to answer the question for randomness in this article, we delineate and sharpen its contour and outline.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2019
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N