Independence in Administrative Adjudications: When and Why Agency Judges Are Subject to Deference and Influence.
Are administrative adjudicators subject to external influence and pressures? We present the results from a nationwide survey of agency adjudicators, focusing on immigration judges (IJs) and administrative law judges (ALJs) in the Social Security Administration (SSA). ALJs follow decisional procedure...
| Publicado en: | Administration & Society Vol. 52; no. 2; pp. 171 - 207 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Feb2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=141048189&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 141048189 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00953997 ADT jtl: Administration & Society issn: 00953997 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2020 vid: 52 iid: 2 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. artinfo: ui: 141048189 10.1177/0095399718760593 ppf: 171 ppct: 36 formats: tig: atl: Independence in Administrative Adjudications: When and Why Agency Judges Are Subject to Deference and Influence. aug: au: Chand, Daniel E. Schreckhise, William Dean affil: Kent State University, OH, USA University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, USA su: United States. Social Security Administration Respect Administrative procedure Examiners (Administrative procedure) Administrative acts sug: subj: Respect United States. Social Security Administration Administration of Human Resource Programs (except Education, Public Health, and Veterans' Affairs Programs) Administrative procedure Examiners (Administrative procedure) Administrative acts keyword: administrative adjudication administrative judges immigration social security disablity administrative adjudication administrative judges immigration social security disablity ab: Are administrative adjudicators subject to external influence and pressures? We present the results from a nationwide survey of agency adjudicators, focusing on immigration judges (IJs) and administrative law judges (ALJs) in the Social Security Administration (SSA). ALJs follow decisional procedures spelled out in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and are given substantial legal protections from agency pressures. IJs do not follow APA procedures, nor do they receive its protections. We find IJs give significantly greater deference to the positions of the public, their agency, Congress, and the president, and report more favorable attitudes toward interest groups in adjudications. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|