Oropharyngeal Oxygen Concentration Is Dependent on the Oxygen Mask System and Sampling Location.

BACKGROUND: Numerous oxygen delivery systems are used to treat hypoxemia. It is unknown if F... at the lips predicts oropharyngeal F... for various oxygen mask systems. We tested whether F... measurements differed between the lips and oropharynx, and whether this difference depends on the mask syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 30 - 37
Autores principales: Yanez, N. David, Fu, Alexander Y., Treggiari, Miriam M., Kirsch, Jeffrey R.
Formato: CEU pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Jan2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141064439&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141064439
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 65
      iid: 1
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141064439
        141064439
        141064439
        10.4187/respcare.07027
        141064439
      ppf: 30
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Oropharyngeal Oxygen Concentration Is Dependent on the Oxygen Mask System and Sampling Location.
      aug:
        au:
          Yanez, N. David
          Fu, Alexander Y.
          Treggiari, Miriam M.
          Kirsch, Jeffrey R.
        affil: Division of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
      sug:
        subj:
          Oxygen Masks
          Oxygen Consumption
          Oropharynx
          Lip
          Insertion Sites
          Laryngeal Masks
          Tidal Volume
          Crossover Design
          Repeated Measures
          Confidence Intervals
          Human
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Linear Regression
          Descriptive Statistics
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Data Analysis Software
          Sample Size
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
      ab: BACKGROUND: Numerous oxygen delivery systems are used to treat hypoxemia. It is unknown if F... at the lips predicts oropharyngeal F... for various oxygen mask systems. We tested whether F... measurements differed between the lips and oropharynx, and whether this difference depends on the mask system. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers had one sampling catheter positioned at the lips and another catheter in the oropharynx. F... was sampled at each location while the subjects breathed normal tidal volumes with oxygen at 15 L/min via 4 delivery devices: a simple mask, a non-rebreather mask, a face mask with a diffuser that concentrates and directs O2 toward the mouth and nose (mask with diffuser), and a closed mask with a Jackson-Rees circuit. Data were analyzed by using a linear mixed model to account for subject crossover in the repeated measures design. RESULTS: F... levels differed significantly for the 4 delivery mask systems (P < .001) and by sampling catheter location (P < .001). Differences in mean F... between the lips and the oropharynx were observed for the mask with diffuser (difference 0.30, 95% CI 0.25-0.36; P < .001), and non-rebreather mask (difference 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.15; P = .001). The mean F... at the oropharynx was highest for the closed mask (0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.00), followed by the non-rebreather mask (0.76, 95% CI 0.72-0.81), simple mask (0.62, 95% CI 0.58-0.67), and the mask with diffuser (0.51, 95% CI 0.46-0.56). At the lips, the mean F... was highest for the closed mask (0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.00), followed by the non-rebreather mask (0.86, 95% CI 0.81- 0.90), OxyMask (0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86), and simple mask (0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: With high oxygen flows and normal tidal volume breathing, F... measurements obtained at the oropharynx or at the lips depended on the device used, with the mask with diffuser showing the most significant discrepancies. F... measures at the oropharynx and the lips were only consistent for the closed mask system.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N