Validation of a Proposed Algorithm for Assistance Titration During Proportional Assist Ventilation With Load-Adjustable Gain Factors.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to validate a recently proposed algorithm for assistance titration during proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors, based on a noninvasive estimation of maximum inspiratory pressure (peak Pmus) and inspiratory effort (pressure-time product...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Respiratory Care Vol. 65; no. 1; pp. 36 - 45
Autores principales: Amargiannitakis, Vasilios, Gialamas, Ioannis, Pediaditis, Emmanouil, Soundoulounaki, Stella, Prinianakis, Georgios, Vaporidi, Katerina, Akoumianaki, Evangelia, Proklou, Athanasia, Alexopoulou, Christina, Georgopoulos, Dimitrios, Kondili, Eumorfia
Formato: CEU equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Jan2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141064440&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141064440
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00201324
        4GG
      jtl: Respiratory Care
      issn: 00201324
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 65
      iid: 1
      pid: 1365
      pub: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
      place: New Rochelle, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141064440
        141064440
        141064440
        10.4187/respcare.06988
        141064440
      ppf: 36
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Validation of a Proposed Algorithm for Assistance Titration During Proportional Assist Ventilation With Load-Adjustable Gain Factors.
      aug:
        au:
          Amargiannitakis, Vasilios
          Gialamas, Ioannis
          Pediaditis, Emmanouil
          Soundoulounaki, Stella
          Prinianakis, Georgios
          Vaporidi, Katerina
          Akoumianaki, Evangelia
          Proklou, Athanasia
          Alexopoulou, Christina
          Georgopoulos, Dimitrios
          Kondili, Eumorfia
        affil: Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Heraklion and School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Crete, Greece
      sug:
        subj:
          Algorithms Evaluation
          Respiration, Artificial Methods
          Human
          Academic Medical Centers
          Greece
          Retrospective Design
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Airway Pressure
          Respiratory Muscles Physiology
          Pressure Support Ventilation
          Ventilator Weaning
          Inspiration, Respiratory
          Descriptive Statistics
          Linear Regression
          Data Analysis Software
          ROC Curve
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Education, Continuing (Credit)
      ab: BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to validate a recently proposed algorithm for assistance titration during proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors, based on a noninvasive estimation of maximum inspiratory pressure (peak Pmus) and inspiratory effort (pressure-time product [PTP] peak Pmus). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the recordings obtained from 26 subjects ventilated on proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors under different conditions, each considered as an experimental case. The estimated inspiratory output (peak Pmus) and effort (PTP-peak Pmus) were compared with the actual-determined by the measurement of transdiaphragmatic pressure- and the derived PTP. Validation of the algorithm was performed by assessing the accuracy of peak Pmus in predicting the actual inspiratory muscle effort and indicating the appropriate level of assist. RESULTS: In the 63 experimental cases analyzed, a limited agreement was observed between the estimated and the actual inspiratory muscle pressure (-11 to 10 cm H2O) and effort (-82 to 125 cm H2O x s/min). The sensitivity and specificity of peak Pmus to predict the range of the actual inspiratory effort was 81.2% and 58.1%, respectively. In 49% of experimental cases, the level of assist indicated by the algorithm differed from that indicated by the transdiaphragmatic pressure and PTP. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm had limited accuracy in estimating inspiratory muscle effort and with indicating the appropriate level of assist.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        CEU
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N