Reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry in persons with conservatively managed wrist fractures.

Objective: Wrist fracture is a common injury in Norway. Pressure algometry is widely used to quantify patients' pain threshold in various anatomical locations. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability of pain pressure threshold (PPT) algometry in persons with conservatively managed dista...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Research International Vol. 25; no. 1
Autores principales: Sæbø, Humaira, Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell, Stausholm, Martin Bjørn, Bjordal, Jan Magnus, Joensen, Jon
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141153315&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141153315
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13582267
        GPG
      jtl: Physiotherapy Research International
      issn: 13582267
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 25
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141153315
        141153315
        141153315
        10.1002/pri.1797
        141153315
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Reliability of pain pressure threshold algometry in persons with conservatively managed wrist fractures.
      aug:
        au:
          Sæbø, Humaira
          Naterstad, Ingvill Fjell
          Stausholm, Martin Bjørn
          Bjordal, Jan Magnus
          Joensen, Jon
        affil: Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen Norway
      sug:
        subj:
          Pain Threshold
          Algometry
          Wrist Fractures Therapy
          Radius Fractures Therapy
          Human
          Pain Measurement
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Intrarater Reliability
          Interrater Reliability
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Confidence Intervals
          Male
          Female
          Funding Source
          Norway
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Male
          Female
      ab: Objective: Wrist fracture is a common injury in Norway. Pressure algometry is widely used to quantify patients' pain threshold in various anatomical locations. The aim of this study was to explore the reliability of pain pressure threshold (PPT) algometry in persons with conservatively managed distal radius fractures. Methods: In this cross‐sectional study, three raters (A, B, and C) tested the PPT of participants (18–97 years of age) with a unilateral distal radius fracture after removal of the cast. The raters conducted two measurements of both wrists. Intrarater reliability was examined in 75, 50, and 25 participants by Raters A, B, and C, respectively. Interrater reliability was tested in 50 and 25 participants by Rater Pairs A–B and A–C, respectively. Relative reliability was calculated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC1.1) and absolute reliability using within‐subject standard deviation (Sw). Results: There was a significant difference in the PPT between the participants' injured and noninjured wrists (p <.0001). The mean PPT was 29% lower in the injured than in the noninjured wrists, 175 kPa (SD ± 62) versus 248 kPa (SD ± 83). Intrarater reliability (A) of PPT algometry was better in injured wrists than in noninjured wrists (ICC1.1 = 0.825 vs. 0.765 and Sw = 27 vs. 43 kPa). Similarly, interrater reliability of PPT algometry was better in injured wrists than in noninjured wrists. In injured wrists, the interrater reliability of PPT algometry between Raters A and B was 0.617 (ICC1.1) and Sw was 51 kPa, and between Raters A and C, the interrater reliability was 0.706 (ICC1.1) and Sw was 48 kPa. Conclusion: PPT algometry is a useful measurement tool with acceptable reliability and thus suitable for monitoring and quantifying pain in persons with conservatively managed wrist fractures. To be more certain that a change has occurred, the same rater should perform the measurements.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N