What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective.

Background: Ineffective research-practice translation is a major challenge to population health improvement. This paper presents an international perspective on the barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of and engagement in Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the fields...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity Vol. 17; no. 1; pp. 1 - 13
Main Authors: Koorts, Harriet, Naylor, Patti-Jean, Laws, Rachel, Love, Penelope, Maple, Jaimie-Lee, van Nassau, Femke
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: BioMed Central 1/16/2020
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141233816&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141233816
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14795868
        1CR7
      jtl: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition & Physical Activity
      issn: 14795868
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1/16/2020
      vid: 17
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141233816
        141233816
        141233816
        10.1186/s12966-020-0909-z
        141233816
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 12
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: What hinders and helps academics to conduct Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the field of nutrition and physical activity? An international perspective.
      aug:
        au:
          Koorts, Harriet
          Naylor, Patti-Jean
          Laws, Rachel
          Love, Penelope
          Maple, Jaimie-Lee
          van Nassau, Femke
        affil: Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Attitude
          Diffusion of Innovation
          Implementation Science
          Research
          Nutrition
          Exercise
          Human
          Multimethod Studies
          Questionnaires
          Focus Groups
          Descriptive Statistics
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Thematic Analysis
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Professional Competence
          Organizational Culture
          Academic Performance
          Self-Advocacy
          Personnel Recruitment
          Financial Support
          Publishing
          Public Health
          Population Health
          World Health
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: Ineffective research-practice translation is a major challenge to population health improvement. This paper presents an international perspective on the barriers and facilitators associated with the uptake of and engagement in Dissemination and Implementation (D&I) research in the fields of physical activity and nutrition. Methods: A mixed methods study involving participants from the International Society for Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (ISBNPA) network. Participants completed an online survey (May–July 2018) and/or participated in a focus group during the annual ISBNPA conference (June 2018). Descriptive statistics were generated for quantitative online and pre-focus group survey data. Fisher's exact tests investigated associations of (i) length of time in academia, (ii) career stage and (iii) country of work, and agreement with 'perceptions of D&I'. Qualitative data were analysed thematically. Results: In total, 141 participants responded to the survey (76% female, 21% aged 35–39 years, 14 countries represented) and 25 participated in focus groups (n = 3). Participants self-identified as having knowledge (48%), skills (53%) and experience supporting others (40%) to conduct D&I research. The majority (96%) perceived D&I was important, with 66% having organizational support for D&I, yet only 52% reported prioritizing D&I research. Perceptions of D&I differed by length of time in academia, career stage and country of work. Barriers included: (i) lack of D&I expertise; (ii) lack of organisational support/value for D&I; (iii) embedded scientific beliefs/culture; (iv) methodological challenges with D&I research; (v) funding/publishing priorities and; (vi) academic performance structures. Facilitators included: (i) increased presence/value of D&I; (ii) collective advocacy; (iii) organisational support for D&I; (iv) recruitment of D&I scientists and; (v) restructure of academic performance models, funding/publishing criteria. Conclusions: Individual, organisational and system-wide factors hindered academics' engagement with and support for D&I research, which was perceived to reduce opportunities for research-practice translation. Factors were mostly consistent across countries and individual career stages/time spent in academia. Embedding D&I early within academic training, and system-wide reorientation of academic performance and funding structures to promote and facilitate D&I research, are some of the necessary actions to reduce the research-practice gap. Consistent with public health more broadly, these changes are long overdue in the fields of physical activity and nutrition.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N