Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences, written by Thomas Pölzler.
Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences, written by Thomas Pölzler Chapters three to six deal with four different contributions to the moral realism/anti-realism debate that substantially draw on scientific premises. As a matter of legitimate choice of focus, Pölzler refrains from discussing any ph...
| Publicado en: | Grazer Philosophische Studien Vol. 96; no. 4; pp. 646 - 655 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Book Review |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
Nov2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141345973&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 141345973 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 01659227 NFG jtl: Grazer Philosophische Studien issn: 01659227 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Nov2019 vid: 96 iid: 4 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 141345973 10.1163/18756735-09604001 ppf: 646 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 83KB tig: atl: Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences, written by Thomas Pölzler. aug: au: Sofroni, Razvan affil: Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin su: Moral Reality & the Empirical Sciences (Book) Philosophy Spacetime Normativity (Ethics) Debate Moral judgment Moral realism Moral development sug: subj: Moral Reality & the Empirical Sciences (Book) Philosophy Spacetime Normativity (Ethics) Debate Moral judgment Moral realism Moral development ab: Moral Reality and the Empirical Sciences, written by Thomas Pölzler Chapters three to six deal with four different contributions to the moral realism/anti-realism debate that substantially draw on scientific premises. As a matter of legitimate choice of focus, Pölzler refrains from discussing any philosophical issues arising from the particular attempts to construct science-based arguments for metaethical claims which he discusses in chapters three to six of the book. Jesse Prinz's version of sentimentalism, which Pölzler discusses here and which just is the position expressed in the conclusion of the argument, is compatible with moral realism. pubtype: Review doctype: Book Review src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Grazer Philosophische Studien is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Grazer Philosophische Studien holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2019 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|