Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles.

This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Questio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 26; no. 1; pp. 293 - 308
Autor principal: Keeling, Geoff
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141385382&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 141385382
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2020
      vid: 26
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141385382
        10.1007/s11948-019-00096-1
      ppf: 293
      ppct: 15
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 611KB
      tig:
        atl: Why Trolley Problems Matter for the Ethics of Automated Vehicles.
      aug:
        au: Keeling, Geoff
        affil: Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, Cotham House, BS6 6JL, Bristol, UK
      su:
        Ethics
        Harm (Ethics)
        Vehicles
      sug:
        subj:
          Ethics
          Harm (Ethics)
          Vehicles
      keyword:
        Automated vehicles
        Ethics of harm
        Ethics of risk
        Trolley problems
      ab: This paper argues against the view that trolley cases are of little or no relevance to the ethics of automated vehicles. Four arguments for this view are outlined and rejected: the Not Going to Happen Argument, the Moral Difference Argument, the Impossible Deliberation Argument and the Wrong Question Argument. In making clear where these arguments go wrong, a positive account is developed of how trolley cases can inform the ethics of automated vehicles.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2020. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N