SLEIGHT IS RIGHT: CYBER CONTROL AS A NEW BATTLEGROUND FOR AFRICAN ELECTIONS.

Sleight of hand in manipulating the computation of results has become the new might for deciding who wins presidential elections. It appears that whoever controls the computation exercises a right to take advantage and win, and whoever loses or relinquishes control of the computation loses the elect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:African Affairs Vol. 119; no. 1; pp. 68 - 90
Autor principal: Amoah, Michael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Jan2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141401734&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 141401734
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00019909
        AAF
      jtl: African Affairs
      issn: 00019909
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 119
      iid: 1
      pid: 622
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141401734
        10.1093/afraf/adz023
      ppf: 68
      ppct: 22
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: SLEIGHT IS RIGHT: CYBER CONTROL AS A NEW BATTLEGROUND FOR AFRICAN ELECTIONS.
      aug:
        au: Amoah, Michael
        affil: Firoz Lalji Centre for Africa, Institute of Global Affairs, London School of Economics and Political Science
      su:
        Presidential elections
        Corrupt practices in elections
        Computer hacking
        Management of elections
        Database management
        African politics & government
      sug:
        subj:
          Presidential elections
          Corrupt practices in elections
          Computer hacking
          Management of elections
          Database management
          African politics & government
      ab: Sleight of hand in manipulating the computation of results has become the new might for deciding who wins presidential elections. It appears that whoever controls the computation exercises a right to take advantage and win, and whoever loses or relinquishes control of the computation loses the election. As incumbents do not want to be identified with direct interference or rigging, hacking has become an alternative means. This raises a serious challenge for election management bodies (EMBs) and a new frontier for international observation. As electronic data management has become a key battleground, international observers cannot restrict their monitoring to the manual process alone. However, individual states may have data sensitivity concerns about granting electronic monitoring access to partisan international observers. Institutionalizing internationally agreed protocols that would allow real-time monitoring of EMBs' computer systems by international observers or forensic audits of any stage of the electoral process to investigate interference, manipulation, hacking, and counter claims, is now a necessity. At the same time, the extent to which international monitors can be trusted to be non-partisan is of equal importance and could reduce forum shopping over time.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N