Impact of China's decision-making processes on international cooperation: cases of peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance/disaster relief.
International cooperation on peacekeeping operations, and on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations, is important in tackling global non-traditional security threats. It also helps China address its 'trust deficit' problem. While both operations seem 'low hanging fruit' for in...
| Publicado en: | Australian Journal of International Affairs Vol. 74; no. 1; pp. 54 - 72 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Feb2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141412394&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 141412394 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 10357718 UAF jtl: Australian Journal of International Affairs issn: 10357718 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2020 vid: 74 iid: 1 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 141412394 10.1080/10357718.2019.1693502 ppf: 54 ppct: 18 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 1.2MB tig: atl: Impact of China's decision-making processes on international cooperation: cases of peacekeeping and humanitarian assistance/disaster relief. aug: au: Hirono, Miwa affil: College of Global Liberal Arts / Graduate School of International Relations, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka, Japan su: International cooperation Humanitarian assistance Human security Capacity building International relations China sug: subj: China International cooperation Humanitarian assistance Human security Capacity building International relations keyword: Cambodia disaster relief foreign policy analysis humanitarianism peacekeeping ab: International cooperation on peacekeeping operations, and on humanitarian assistance and disaster relief (HADR) operations, is important in tackling global non-traditional security threats. It also helps China address its 'trust deficit' problem. While both operations seem 'low hanging fruit' for international cooperation, the ways in which China undertakes peacekeeping and HADR cooperation differ – the former encompasses not only cooperation for technical and capacity development but also cooperation for policy harmonisation, while China's HADR cooperation is limited to technical and capacity development. This paper asks, 'why the difference?', despite the fact that they both address similar policy problems. It argues that the difference corresponds to the level of holisticity/fragmentation of China's decision-making process. The more holistic China's decision-making process, the deeper the international cooperation. The nature of China's decision-making processes has international policy implications, because the fragmented nature of those processes maintains cooperation at a functional level only, and hinders the deeper development of cooperation into policy harmonisation. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Australian Journal of International Affairs is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Australian Journal of International Affairs holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|