Deleuze's Infernal Book: Reflections on Difference and Repetition.
Deleuze's Difference and Repetition is a notoriously difficult work of philosophy. Moreover, it is a work of philosophy that has led to quite divergent interpretations. How are we to account for this phenomenon of generating such distinct interpretations and appropriations? In this article, I apply...
| Publicado en: | Deleuze & Guattari Studies Vol. 14; no. 1; pp. 5 - 25 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Edinburgh University Press
Feb2020
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141418726&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 141418726 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 23989777 L8MC jtl: Deleuze & Guattari Studies issn: 23989777 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Feb2020 vid: 14 iid: 1 pid: 2327 pub: Edinburgh University Press artinfo: ui: 141418726 10.3366/dlgs.2020.0385 ppf: 5 ppct: 20 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 104KB tig: atl: Deleuze's Infernal Book: Reflections on Difference and Repetition. aug: au: Bryant, Levi R. affil: Collin College su: Individuation (Psychology) Individuation (Philosophy) Work in process Earnings management Reflections Writing processes Fertility sug: subj: Individuation (Psychology) Individuation (Philosophy) Work in process Earnings management Reflections Writing processes Fertility keyword: actual book individuation machine style virtual ab: Deleuze's Difference and Repetition is a notoriously difficult work of philosophy. Moreover, it is a work of philosophy that has led to quite divergent interpretations. How are we to account for this phenomenon of generating such distinct interpretations and appropriations? In this article, I apply Deleuze's theory of problems, questions and individuation to Deleuze's text as a way of understanding the stylistic strategy of his writing. Given Deleuze's critique of identity and representation, he would fall into a performative contradiction if his writing were designed to transmit an identical thought from sender to receiver such that the receiver then could be said to represent Deleuze's thought. Rather, I argue, Deleuze aims to write 'machinic' or 'productive' works that lead to the production of something new through the reader's encounter with the work. Not only does Difference and Repetition theorise the process of creative individuation in the production of beings, I contend, but it also forces the reader to undergo a process of creative individuation, through which they produce a non-identical double of the work in the process of their reading that then takes on a life of its own. It is this phenomenon of the book as a machine for producing difference, I contend, that helps to account for the tremendous creative fecundity it has generated in being appropriated by a wide variety of disciplines and practices. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Deleuze & Guattari Studies is the property of Edinburgh University Press and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Deleuze & Guattari Studies holder: Edinburgh University Press dt: @attributes: year: 2020 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|