Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.

Background: For diagnostic procedures to be clinically useful, they must be reliable. The interpretation of lumbar spine MRI scans is subject to variability and there is a lack of studies where reliability of multiple degenerative pathologies are rated simultaneously. The objective of our study was...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Vol. 28; no. 1; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Doktor, Klaus, Jensen, Tue Secher, Christensen, Henrik Wulff, Fredberg, Ulrich, Kindt, Morten, Boyle, Eleanor, Hartvigsen, Jan
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 2/11/2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141662691&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141662691
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2045709X
        BG1Z
      jtl: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
      issn: 2045709X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2/11/2020
      vid: 28
      iid: 1
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141662691
        141662691
        141662691
        10.1186/s12998-020-0297-0
        141662691
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Degenerative findings in lumbar spine MRI: an inter-rater reliability study involving three raters.
      aug:
        au:
          Doktor, Klaus
          Jensen, Tue Secher
          Christensen, Henrik Wulff
          Fredberg, Ulrich
          Kindt, Morten
          Boyle, Eleanor
          Hartvigsen, Jan
        affil: Department of Sport Sciences and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
      sug:
        subj:
          Lumbar Vertebrae Radiography
          Lumbar Vertebrae Pathology
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Interrater Reliability Evaluation
          Spinal Diseases Physiopathology
          Human
          Low Back Pain Symptoms
          Radiologists
          Chiropractors
          Spondylolisthesis
          Scoliosis
          Zygapophyseal Joint Pathology
          kappa Statistic
          Benchmarking
          Reliability
          Reproducibility of Results
          Adult
          Funding Source
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Background: For diagnostic procedures to be clinically useful, they must be reliable. The interpretation of lumbar spine MRI scans is subject to variability and there is a lack of studies where reliability of multiple degenerative pathologies are rated simultaneously. The objective of our study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of three independent raters evaluating degenerative pathologies seen with lumbar spine MRI. Methods: Fifty-nine people, 35 patients with low back pain (LBP) or LBP and leg pain and 24 people without LBP or leg pain, received an MRI of the lumbar spine. Three raters (one radiologist and two chiropractors) evaluated the MRIs for the presence and severity of eight degenerative spinal pathologies using a standardized format: Spondylolisthesis, scoliosis, annular fissure, disc degeneration, disc contour, nerve root compromise, spinal stenosis and facet joint degeneration. Findings were identified and classified at disc level according to type and severity. Raters were instructed to evaluate all study sample persons once to assess inter-rater reliability (fully crossed design). Reliability was calculated using Gwet's Agreement Coefficients (AC1 and AC2) and Cohen's Kappa (κ) and Conger's extension of Cohen's. Gwet's probabilistic benchmarking method to the Landis and Koch scale was used. MRI-findings achieving substantial reliability was considered acceptable. Results: Inter-rater reliability for all raters combined, ranged from (Gwet's AC1 or AC2): 0.64–0.99 and according to probabilistic benchmarking to the Landis and Koch scale equivalent to moderate to almost perfect reliability. Overall reliability level for individual pathologies was almost perfect reliability for spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, scoliosis and annular fissure, substantial for nerve root compromise and disc degeneration, and moderate for facet joint degeneration and disc contour. Conclusion: Inter-rater reliability for 3 raters, evaluating 177 disc levels, was found to be overall acceptable for 6 out of 8 degenerative MRI-findings in the lumbar spine. Ratings of facet joint degeneration and disc contour achieved moderate reliability and was considered unacceptable.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N