Can point‐of‐care testing improve access to diagnostic screening and testing for people with learning disabilities? Exploring perspectives to improve access and equity.

Accessible summary: People with learning disabilities, like everyone else, need to have their health checked, but this can sometimes be difficult.We asked people with learning disabilities and the people who look after them what they thought about how they have blood tests done or their hearing chec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:British Journal of Learning Disabilities Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 28 - 37
Main Authors: Giles, Karen, Ling, Jonathan, Gordon, Isabel
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2020
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141781768&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141781768
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13544187
        F04
      jtl: British Journal of Learning Disabilities
      issn: 13544187
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 48
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141781768
        141781768
        141781768
        10.1111/bld.12302
        141781768
      ppf: 28
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Can point‐of‐care testing improve access to diagnostic screening and testing for people with learning disabilities? Exploring perspectives to improve access and equity.
      aug:
        au:
          Giles, Karen
          Ling, Jonathan
          Gordon, Isabel
        affil: Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland TWR, , USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Point-of-Care Testing
          Minimally Invasive Procedures Methods
          Health Screening Methods
          Intellectual Disability Diagnosis
          Health Services Accessibility
          Consumer Attitudes
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Human
          Focus Groups
          Semi-Structured Interview
          Thematic Analysis
          Health Knowledge
          Support, Psychosocial
          Health Labor Supply
      ab: Accessible summary: People with learning disabilities, like everyone else, need to have their health checked, but this can sometimes be difficult.We asked people with learning disabilities and the people who look after them what they thought about how they have blood tests done or their hearing checked.We found out the things that make it a positive experience.We learnt that people with learning disabilities and the people who look after them thought point‐of‐care testing would be a good idea.We learnt what things they thought should be put in place to make this type of testing work well for them. Background: People with learning disabilities have an increased risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and hearing loss. This study explored service users' and health professionals' perspectives and experiences of adopting minimally invasive diagnostic and screening devices, known as point‐of‐care testing (POCT) as a means of improving access and engagement. Materials and Methods: Focus groups and semi‐structured interviews were undertaken with attendees at a nonhealthcare day centre, specialist learning disability clinical network and national leads as well as researchers into learning disability and point‐of‐care issues. Thematic analysis of the data was undertaken. Results: There was a lack of awareness and experience of POCT across the users and health professionals. Despite this, on seeing the devices and discussing application there was strong support and acceptability across all participants for their use so long as individual needs were addressed. There was no consistent sense of where this testing should be done but support for the flexibility this could provide in terms of nonmedicalised locations and individual needs. Strategies for success included the use of specific adjustments such as the presence of a known carer, pre‐testing information in an appropriate format and taking into account each individual's preferences. Conclusions: POCT is considered a viable and useful method for improving access to testing for people with learning disabilities. Adoption barriers in implementation identified as specific to the field of learning disabilities included lack of POCT awareness and diagnostic overshadowing concerns, and adjusting for individualised needs is essential.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N