Neologicism, Frege's Constraint, and the Frege‐Heck Condition.

One of the more distinctive features of Bob Hale and Crispin Wright's neologicism about arithmetic is their invocation of Frege's Constraint – roughly, the requirement that the core empirical applications for a class of numbers be "built directly into" their formal characterization. In particular, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Nous (0029-4624) Vol. 54; no. 1; pp. 54 - 78
Autores principales: Snyder, Eric, Samuels, Richard, Shapiro, Stewart
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=141784780&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 141784780
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00294624
        D97
      jtl: Nous (0029-4624)
      issn: 00294624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 54
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141784780
        10.1111/nous.12249
      ppf: 54
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 198KB
      tig:
        atl: Neologicism, Frege's Constraint, and the Frege‐Heck Condition.
      aug:
        au:
          Snyder, Eric
          Samuels, Richard
          Shapiro, Stewart
        affil: Ohio State University (Philosophy)
      su:
        Foundations of arithmetic
        Arithmetic
        Axioms
        Numerals
        Counting
        Mental arithmetic
      sug:
        subj:
          Foundations of arithmetic
          Arithmetic
          Axioms
          Numerals
          Counting
          Mental arithmetic
      ab: One of the more distinctive features of Bob Hale and Crispin Wright's neologicism about arithmetic is their invocation of Frege's Constraint – roughly, the requirement that the core empirical applications for a class of numbers be "built directly into" their formal characterization. In particular, they maintain that, if adopted, Frege's Constraint adjudicates in favor of their preferred foundation – Hume's Principle – and against alternatives, such as the Dedekind‐Peano axioms. In what follows we establish two main claims. First, we show that, if sound, Hale and Wright's arguments for Frege's Constraint at most establish a version on which the relevant application of the naturals is transitive counting – roughly, the counting procedure by which numerals are used to answer "how many"‐questions. Second, we show that this version of Frege's Constraint fails to adjudicate in favor of Hume's Principle. If this is the version of Frege's Constraint that a foundation for arithmetic must respect, then Hume's Principle no more – and no less – meets the requirement than the Dedekind‐Peano axioms do.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Nous (0029-4624) is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Nous (0029-4624)
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2020
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N