Hans Jonas and the Ethics of Human Subjects Research.

In the 1960s, human experimentation and public funding of research increased significantly, and with the rise of the modern teaching hospital, the distinction between clinical care and experimentation became more and more blurred. Yet little in the way of meaningful government regulation existed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Hastings Center Report Vol. 50; no. 1; pp. 8 - 10
Autor principal: Diekema, Douglas S.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jan2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=141801870&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 141801870
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00930334
        HCR
      jtl: Hastings Center Report
      issn: 00930334
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2020
      vid: 50
      iid: 1
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141801870
        10.1002/hast.1077
      ppf: 8
      ppct: 2
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: C
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 85KB
      tig:
        atl: Hans Jonas and the Ethics of Human Subjects Research.
      aug:
        au: Diekema, Douglas S.
      su:
        United States
        Attitude (Psychology)
        Bioethics
        Informed consent (Medical law)
        Medical personnel
        Research ethics
        Government regulation
        Human beings
        Human research subjects
        Experimental design
        Philosophy of medicine
      sug:
        subj:
          Attitude (Psychology)
          Bioethics
          Informed consent (Medical law)
          Medical personnel
          Research ethics
          Government regulation
          Human beings
          Human research subjects
          United States
          Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
          Experimental design
          Philosophy of medicine
      ab: In the 1960s, human experimentation and public funding of research increased significantly, and with the rise of the modern teaching hospital, the distinction between clinical care and experimentation became more and more blurred. Yet little in the way of meaningful government regulation existed in the United States prior to 1970. In 1966, Paul Freund, the president of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, appointed an interdisciplinary working group to consult on the issues being raised by human experimentation. Contributions from the group were published in a 1969 issue of Daedalus titled Ethical Aspects of Experimentation with Human Subjects. In the lead essay, Hans Jonas challenged then‐conventional understandings of the moral problems posed by research involving humans and argued for an alternative moral framework. To Jonas, it mattered whether the physician was trying to make the patient well rather than trying to find out how to improve the health of future patients.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N