Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT).

Purpose: To compare the results from a simulated computerized adaptive test (CAT) for the 28-item Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire and the original paper-pencil version in terms of efficiency (main outcome), defined as percentage item reduction.Methods: Using paper-pencil IVI data fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Quality of Life Research Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 765 - 775
Autores principales: Fenwick, Eva K., Loe, Bao Sheng, Khadka, Jyoti, Man, Ryan E. K., Rees, Gwyn, Lamoureux, Ecosse L.
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Mar2020
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=141807349&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 141807349
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09629343
        GPQ
      jtl: Quality of Life Research
      issn: 09629343
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2020
      vid: 29
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        141807349
        141807349
        NLM31707693
        10.1007/s11136-019-02354-y
        NLM31707693
        141807349
      ppf: 765
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Optimizing measurement of vision-related quality of life: a computerized adaptive test for the impact of vision impairment questionnaire (IVI-CAT).
      aug:
        au:
          Fenwick, Eva K.
          Loe, Bao Sheng
          Khadka, Jyoti
          Man, Ryan E. K.
          Rees, Gwyn
          Lamoureux, Ecosse L.
        affil: Centre for Eye Research Australia, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Psychometrics Methods
          Quality of Life Psychosocial Factors
          Vision, Subnormal Psychosocial Factors
          Mental Health
          Reproducibility of Results
          Male
          Female
          Young Adult
          Computers and Computerization
          Middle Age
          Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life Index
          Impact of Events Scale
          Scales
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Purpose: To compare the results from a simulated computerized adaptive test (CAT) for the 28-item Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) questionnaire and the original paper-pencil version in terms of efficiency (main outcome), defined as percentage item reduction.Methods: Using paper-pencil IVI data from 832 participants across the spectrum of vision impairment, item calibrations of the 28-item IVI instrument and its associated 20-item vision-specific functioning (VSF) and 8-item emotional well-being (EWB) subscales were generated with Rasch analysis. Based on these calibrations, CAT simulations were conducted on 1000 cases, with 'high' and 'moderate' precision stopping rules (standard error of measurement [SEM] 0.387 and 0.521, respectively). We examined the average number of items needed to satisfy the stopping rules and the corresponding percentage item reduction, level of agreement between person measures estimated from the full IVI item bank and from the CAT simulations, and item exposure rates (IER).Results: For the overall IVI-CAT, 5 or 9.7 items were required, on average, to obtain moderate or high precision estimates of vision-related quality of life, corresponding to 82.1 and 65.4% item reductions compared to the paper-pencil IVI. Agreement was high between the person measures generated from the full IVI item bank and the IVI-CAT for both the high precision simulation (mean bias, - 0.004 logits; 95% LOA - 0.594 to 0.587) and moderate precision simulation (mean bias, 0.014 logits; 95% LOA - 0.828 to 0.855). The IER for the IVI-CAT in the moderate precision simulation was skewed, with six EWB items used > 40% of the time.Conclusion: Compared to the paper-pencil IVI instrument, the IVI-CATs required fewer items without loss of measurement precision, making them potentially attractive outcome instruments for implementation into clinical trials, healthcare, and research. Final versions of the IVI-CATs are available.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N